|
|
109TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
|
Rept. 109-31
Part 1
|
|
BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2005
R E P O R T
of the
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
to accompany
S. 256
together with
DISSENTING VIEWS, ADDITIONAL DISSENTING
VIEWS, AND ADDITIONAL MINORITY VIEWS

APRIL 8, 2005.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
|
|
109TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
|
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
|
Rept. 109-31
Part 1
|
|
BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2005
R E P O R T
of the
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
to accompany
S. 256
together with
DISSENTING VIEWS, ADDITIONAL DISSENTING
VIEWS, AND ADDITIONAL MINORITY VIEWS

APRIL 8, 2005.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
U.S. GOVERNMENT
PRINTING OFFICE
|
20–436
|
WASHINGTON : 2005
|
20–436
|
|
|
For sale by the Superintendent
of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov
Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800
Fax: (202) 512–2250
Mail: Stop SSOP,
Washington, DC 20402–0001
1
|
|
109TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION
|
} |
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
|
{ |
Rept. 109-31
Part 1
|
|
|
BANKRUPTCY
ABUSE PREVENTION AND
CONSUMER PROTECTION
ACT OF 2005
APRIL 8, 2005.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole
House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Mr. Sensenbrenner,
from the Committee on the Judiciary,
submitted the following
R E P O R T
together with
DISSENTING VIEWS,
ADDITIONAL DISSENTING
VIEWS, AND ADDITIONAL MINORITY
VIEWS
[To accompany
S. 256]
[Including cost
estimate of the Congressional Budget Office]
The Committee on the Judiciary,
to whom was referred the bill (S. 256) to
amend title 11 of the United States Code, and for other purposes, having considered
the same, reports favorably thereon without amendment and recommends that the bill
do pass.
|
|
CONTENTS

|
PAGE
|
|
Purpose and Summary
|
2
|
|
Background and Need for the Legislation
|
3
|
|
Factors Supporting Bankruptcy Reform
|
3
|
|
Prior Congressional Consideration of
Bankruptcy
Reform
|
6
|
|
Highlights
of Bankruptcy Reforms
|
10
|
|
Consumer Creditor Bankruptcy Protections
|
10
|
|
Needs-Based Reforms
|
10
|
|
Other Reforms Dealing with Abuse
|
15
|
|
Protections for Creditors—In General
|
16
|
|
Enforcement of Family Support Obligations
|
16
|
|
Protections for Secured Creditors
|
17
|
|
Protections
for Lessors
|
17
|
|
Consumer Debtor Bankruptcy Protections
|
17
|
|
Highlights of Business Bankruptcy Reforms
|
18
|
|
Protections Against Excessive Payments To a Debtor's Insiders and Fraud
by a Debtor's Management
|
19
|
|
Protections for Employees
|
19
|
|
Small Business/Single Asset Real Estate Debtors
|
19
|
|
Financial
Contracts
|
20
|
|
Family Farmers and Family Fishermen
|
20
|
|
Transnational Insolvencies
|
20
|
|
Protections for Small Business Owners
|
21
|
|
Health
Care Providers
|
21
|
|
Other Provisions Having General Impact
|
21
|
|
Privacy
Protections
|
21
|
|
Additional Bankruptcy Judgeships
|
21
|
|
Miscellaneous Provisions
|
22
|
|
Hearings
|
22
|
|
Committee Consideration
|
22
|
|
Votes of the Committee
|
22
|
|
1. Conyers — pay day
loans made to servicemembers
|
22
|
|
2. Watt and Delahunt
— disallowing certain claims
|
23
|
|
3. Watt — postsecondary
education expenses
|
24
|
|
4. Nadler — extension
of time to assume or reject nonresidential real property
|
25
|
|
5. Schiff — no 707(b)(2)
dismissal for identity theft victims
|
26
|
|
6. Delahunt — avoidance
of transfers made within 10 years of the bankruptcy filing to an asset
protection trust (BC § 548)
|
27
|
|
7. Berman & Meehan
— exemption for medically distressed debtors (BC § 522)
|
27
|
|
8. Nadler — nondischarge
of debts related to civil rights violations (BC § 523(a) (resubmitted)
|
28
|
|
9. Meehan — no 707(b)(2)
dismissal for certain disabled veterans
|
29
|
|
10. Jackson Lee —
increase expense allowance for private schools
|
30
|
|
11. Jackson Lee —
en bloc amendments - debts related to (1) sex offenses against minors;
(2) tobacco claims (BC 523(a)
|
31
|
|
12. Motion to report
S. 256 favorably
|
32
|
|
Committee Oversight Findings
|
33
|
|
New Budget Authority and Tax Expenditures
|
33
|
|
Congressional Budget Office Cost Estimate
|
33
|
|
Summary
|
34
|
|
Major Provisions
|
34
|
|
Estimated Cost to the Federal Government
|
35
|
|
Basis of Estimate
|
36
|
|
Spending Subject to Appropriation
|
37
|
|
Means-Testing (Section 102)
|
37
|
|
Studies by the U.S. Trustees, Government Accountability Office (GAO),
and Small Business Administration (SBA) (Sections 103, 205, 230, and
443)
|
37
|
|
Debtor Financial Management Test Training Program (Section 105)
|
38
|
|
Credit Counseling Certification (Section 106)
|
38
|
|
Maintenance of Tax Returns (Section 315)
|
38
|
|
Changes in Bankruptcy Filing Fees (Sections 325 and 418)
|
38
|
|
Current
Law Filing Fees
|
38
|
|
Distribution of Filing Fees
|
39
|
|
Fee Waivers
|
39
|
|
U.S. Trustee Site Visits in Chapter 11 Cases (Section 439)
|
39
|
|
Compilation and Publication of Bankruptcy Data and Statistics (Sections
601-602)
|
39
|
|
Audit Procedures (Section 603)
|
40
|
|
Additional Judgeships—Support Costs (Section 1223)
|
40
|
|
Federal Trade Commission Toll-Free Hotline (Section 1301)
|
40
|
|
Direct Spending and Revenues
|
40
|
|
Additional Judgeships (Section 1223)
|
41
|
|
Changes in Bankruptcy Filing Fees (Sections 102, 325, and 418))
|
41
|
|
Tax Provisions (Title VII)
|
42
|
|
Estimated Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments
|
42
|
|
Mandates
|
42
|
|
Other Impacts
|
42
|
|
Domestic Support Obligations
|
42
|
|
Exemptions
|
43
|
|
Time Limits on Tax Collection
|
43
|
|
Taxes and Administrative Expenses
|
43
|
|
Tax Return
Filing
|
43
|
|
Priority
of Payments
|
44
|
|
Municipal Bankruptcy
|
44
|
|
Fuel Tax
Claims
|
44
|
|
Single
Asset Cases
|
44
|
|
Estimated Impact on the Private Sector
|
44
|
|
Mandates
|
44
|
|
Requirements For Attorneys
|
45
|
|
Notice and Disclosure Requirements
|
45
|
|
Prohibition on Consumer Reporting Agencies
|
46
|
|
Requirement for Closing Credit Accounts
|
46
|
|
Other Impacts on the Private Sector
|
46
|
|
Previous CBO Estimate
|
46
|
|
Estimate Prepared By
|
47
|
|
Estimate Approved By
|
47
|
|
Performance Goals and Objectives
|
47
|
|
Constitutional Authority Statement
|
47
|
|
Section-by-Section Analysis and Discussion
|
47
|
|
101.
Conversion
|
47
|
|
102. Dismissal or Conversion
|
48
|
|
103. Sense of Congress and Study
|
53
|
|
104. Notice of Alternatives
|
53
|
|
105. Debtor Financial Management Training Test Program
|
54
|
|
106. Credit Counseling
|
54
|
|
107. Schedules of Reasonable and Necessary Expenses
|
56
|
|
201. Promotion of Alternative Dispute Resolution
|
57
|
|
202. Effect of Discharge
|
57
|
|
203. Discouraging Abuse of Reaffirmation Agreement Practices
|
57
|
|
204. Preservation of Claims and Defenses Upon Sale of Predatory Loans
|
58
|
|
205. GAO Study and Report on Reaffirmation Agreement Process
|
59
|
|
211. Definition of Domestic Support Obligation
|
59
|
|
212. Priorities for Claims for Domestic Support Obligations
|
59
|
|
213. Requirements To Obtain Confirmation and Discharge in Cases Involving
Domestic Support Obligations
|
60
|
|
214. Exceptions To Automatic Stay in Domestic Support Proceedings
|
61
|
|
215. Nondischargeability of Certain Debts for Alimony, Maintenance,
and Support
|
61
|
|
216. Continued Liability of Property
|
61
|
|
217. Protection of Domestic Support Claims Against Preferential Transfer
Motions
|
62
|
|
218. Disposable Income Defined
|
62
|
|
219. Collection of Child Support
|
62
|
|
220. Nondischargeability of Certain Educational Benefits and Loans
|
62
|
|
221. Amendments To Discourage Abusive
Bankruptcy Filings
|
62
|
|
222. Sense of Congress
|
63
|
|
223. Additional Amendments to Title 11, United States Code
|
63
|
|
224. Protection of Retirement Savings in Bankruptcy
|
63
|
|
225. Protection of Education Savings in Bankruptcy
|
65
|
|
226.
Definitions.
|
65
|
|
227. Restrictions on Debt Relief Agencies
|
66
|
|
228.
Disclosures
|
66
|
|
229. Requirements for Debt Relief Agencies
|
66
|
|
230.
GAO Study
|
67
|
|
231. Protection of Personally Identifiable Information
|
67
|
|
232. Consumer Privacy Ombudsman
|
68
|
|
233. Prohibition on Disclosure of Name of Minor Children
|
68
|
|
234. Protection of Personal Information
|
68
|
|
301. Technical Amendments
|
69
|
|
302. Discouraging Bad Faith Repeat Filings
|
69
|
|
303. Curbing Abusive Filings
|
70
|
|
304. Debtor Retention of Personal Property Security
|
70
|
|
305. Relief from the Automatic Stay When the Debtor Does Not Complete
Intended Surrender of Consumer Debt Collateral
|
71
|
|
306. Giving Secured Creditors Fair Treatment in Chapter 13.Subsection
|
71
|
|
307. Domiciliary Requirements for Exemptions
|
72
|
|
308. Reduction of Homestead Exemption for Fraud
|
72
|
|
309. Protecting Secured Creditors in Chapter 13 Cases
|
73
|
|
310. Limitation on Luxury Goods.
|
74
|
|
311. Automatic Stay
|
74
|
|
312. Extension of Period Between
Bankruptcy Discharges
|
76
|
|
313. Definition of Household Goods and Antiques
|
76
|
|
314. Debt Incurred To Pay Nondischargeable Debts
|
76
|
|
315. Giving Creditors Fair Notice in Chapters 7 and 13 Cases
|
77
|
|
316. Dismissal for Failure To Timely File Schedules or Provide Required
Information
|
79
|
|
317.Adequate Time To Prepare for Hearing on Confirmation of the Plan
|
79
|
|
318. Chapter 13 Plans To Have a 5-Year Duration in Certain Cases
|
79
|
|
319. Sense of Congress Regarding Expansion of Rule 9011 of the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
|
80
|
|
320. Prompt Relief from Stay in Individual Cases
|
80
|
|
321. Chapter 11 Cases Filed by Individuals
|
80
|
|
322. Limitations on Homestead Exemption
|
81
|
|
323. Excluding Employee Benefit Plan Participant Contributions and Other
Property from the Estate
|
82
|
|
324. Exclusive Jurisdiction in Matters Involving
Bankruptcy Professionals
|
82
|
|
325. United States Trustee Program Filing Fee Increase
|
82
|
|
326. Sharing of Compensation
|
83
|
|
327. Fair Valuation of Collateral
|
83
|
|
328. Defaults Based on Nonmonetary Obligations
|
83
|
|
329. Clarification of Postpetition Wages and Benefits
|
84
|
|
330. Delay of Discharge During Pendency of Certain Proceedings
|
84
|
|
331. Limitation on Retention Bonuses, Severance Pay, and Certain Other
Payments
|
84
|
|
332. Fraudulent Involuntary Bankruptcy
|
84
|
|
401. Adequate Protection for Investors
|
86
|
|
402. Meetings of Creditors and Equity Security Holders
|
86
|
|
403. Protection of Refinance of Security Interest
|
86
|
|
404. Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases
|
86
|
|
405. Creditors and Equity Security Holders Committees
|
87
|
|
406. Amendment to Section 546 of Title 11, United States Code
|
87
|
|
407. Amendments to Section 330(a) of Title 11, United States Code
|
87
|
|
408. Postpetition Disclosure and Solicitation
|
87
|
|
409.
Preferences.
|
88
|
|
410. Venue of Certain Proceedings
|
88
|
|
411. Period for Filing Plan under Chapter 11
|
88
|
|
412. Fees Arising from Certain Ownership Interests
|
88
|
|
413. Creditor Representation at First Meeting of Creditors
|
88
|
|
414. Definition of Disinterested Person
|
89
|
|
415. Factors for Compensation of Professional Persons
|
89
|
|
416. Appointment of Elected Trustee
|
89
|
|
417. Utility Service. Section
|
89
|
|
418.
Bankruptcy Fees
|
89
|
|
419. More Complete Information Regarding Assets of the Estate
|
90
|
|
431. Flexible Rules for Disclosure Statement and Plan
|
90
|
|
432.
Definitions
|
90
|
|
433. Standard Form Disclosure Statement and Plan
|
91
|
|
434.Uniform National Reporting Requirements
|
91
|
|
435.Uniform Reporting Rules and Forms for Small Business Cases
|
91
|
|
436. Duties in Small Business Cases
|
91
|
|
437. Plan Filing and Confirmation Deadlines
|
92
|
|
438. Plan Confirmation Deadline
|
92
|
|
439. Duties of the United States Trustee
|
92
|
|
440. Scheduling Conferences
|
93
|
|
441. Serial Filer Provisions
|
93
|
|
442. Expanded Grounds for Dismissal or Conversion and Appointment of
Trustee
|
94
|
|
443. Study of Operation of Title 11, United States Code, with Respect
to Small Businesses
|
95
|
|
444. Payment of Interest
|
95
|
|
445. Priority for Administrative Expenses
|
96
|
|
446. Duties with Respect to a Debtor Who Is a Plan Administrator of
an Employee Benefit Plan
|
96
|
|
447. Appointment of Committee of Retired Employees
|
96
|
|
501. Petition and Proceedings Related to Petition
|
96
|
|
502. Applicability of Other Sections to Chapter 9
|
96
|
|
601. Improved
Bankruptcy Statistics
|
97
|
|
602. Uniform Rules for the Collection of
Bankruptcy Data
|
98
|
|
603. Audit Procedures
|
98
|
|
604. Sense of Congress Regarding Availability of
Bankruptcy Data
|
99
|
|
701. Treatment of Certain Tax Liens
|
100
|
|
702. Treatment of Fuel Tax Claims
|
100
|
|
703.Notice of Request for a Determination of Taxes
|
100
|
|
704. Rate of Interest on Tax Claims
|
101
|
|
705. Priority of Tax Claims
|
101
|
|
706. Priority Property Taxes Incurred
|
101
|
|
707. No Discharge of Fraudulent Taxes in Chapter 13
|
101
|
|
708. No Discharge of Fraudulent Taxes in Chapter 11
|
102
|
|
709. Stay of Tax Proceedings Limited to Prepetition Taxes
|
102
|
|
710. Periodic Payment of Taxes in Chapter 11 Cases
|
102
|
|
711. Avoidance of Statutory Liens Prohibited
|
102
|
|
712. Payment of Taxes in the Conduct of Business
|
102
|
|
713. Tardily Filed Priority Tax Claims
|
103
|
|
714. Income Tax Returns Prepared by Tax Authorities
|
103
|
|
715. Discharge of the Estate's Liability for Unpaid Taxes
|
103
|
|
716. Requirement to File Tax Returns to Confirm Chapter 13 Plans
|
104
|
|
717. Standards for Tax Disclosure
|
104
|
|
718. Setoff of Tax Refunds
|
104
|
|
719. Special Provisions Related to the Treatment of State and Local
Taxes
|
105
|
|
720. Dismissal for Failure to Timely File Tax Returns
|
105
|
|
801. Amendment to add chapter 15 to title 11, United States Code
|
105
|
|
1501. Purpose and scope of application
|
106
|
|
1502.
Definitions
|
107
|
|
1503. International obligations of the United States
|
107
|
|
1504. Commencement of ancillary case
|
107
|
|
1505. Authorization to act in a foreign country
|
109
|
|
1506. Public policy exception
|
109
|
|
1507. Additional assistance
|
109
|
|
1508. Interpretation
|
109
|
|
1509. Right of direct access
|
110
|
|
1510. Limited jurisdiction
|
111
|
|
1511. Commencement of Case Under Section 301 or 303
|
111
|
|
1512. Participation of a foreign representative in a case under this
title
|
111
|
|
1513. Access of foreign creditors to a case under this title
|
111
|
|
1514. Notification of foreign creditors concerning a case under title
11
|
112
|
|
1515. Application for recognition of a foreign proceeding
|
112
|
|
1516. Presumptions concerning recognition
|
112
|
|
1517. Order granting recognition
|
113
|
|
1518. Subsequent information
|
113
|
|
1519. Relief may be granted upon petition for recognition of a foreign
proceeding
|
114
|
|
1520. Effects of recognition of a foreign main proceeding
|
114
|
|
1521. Relief that may be granted upon recognition of a foreign proceeding
|
115
|
|
1522. Protection of creditors and other interested persons
|
116
|
|
1523. Actions to avoid acts detrimental to creditors
|
116
|
|
1524. Intervention by a foreign representative
|
116
|
|
1525. Cooperation and direct communication between the court and foreign
courts or foreign representatives
|
117
|
|
1526 Cooperation and direct communication between the trustee
and foreign courts or foreign representatives
|
117
|
|
1527. Forms of cooperation
|
117
|
|
1528. Commencement of a case under title 11 after recognition of a foreign
main proceeding
|
117
|
|
1529. Coordination of a case under title 11 and a foreign proceeding
|
117
|
|
1530. Coordination of more than one foreign proceeding
|
118
|
|
1531. Presumption of insolvency based on recognition of a foreign main
proceeding
|
118
|
|
1532. Rule of payment in concurrent proceeding
|
118
|
|
802. Other amendments to titles 11 and 28, United States Code
|
118
|
|
901. Treatment of certain agreements by conservators or receivers of
insured depository institutions
|
119
|
|
902. Authority of the FDIC and NCUAB with respect to failed and failing
institutions
|
123
|
|
903. Amendments relating to transfers of qualified financial contracts
|
123
|
|
904. Amendments relating to disreaffirmance or repudiation of qualified
financial contracts
|
125
|
|
905. Clarifying amendment relating to master agreements
|
125
|
|
906. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
|
125
|
|
907.
Bankruptcy law amendments
|
127
|
|
908. Recordkeeping requirements
|
134
|
|
909. Exemptions from contemporaneous execution requirement
|
134
|
|
910. Damage measure
|
134
|
|
911.
SIPC stay
|
135
|
|
1001. Permanent reenactment of chapter 12
|
136
|
|
1002. Debt limit increase
|
136
|
|
1003.Certain claims owed to governmental units
|
136
|
|
1004. Definition of family farmer
|
137
|
|
1005. Elimination of requirement that family farmer and spouse receive
over 50 percent of income from farming operation in year prior to bankruptcy
|
137
|
|
1006. Prohibition of retroactive assessment of disposable income
|
137
|
|
1007. Family fishermen
|
137
|
|
1101.
Definitions
|
138
|
|
1102. Disposal of patient records
|
138
|
|
1103. Administrative expense claim for costs of closing a health care
business and other administrative expenses
|
139
|
|
1104. Appointment of ombudsman to act as patient advocate
|
139
|
|
1105. Debtor in possession; duty of trustee to transfer patients
|
140
|
|
1106. Exclusion from program participation not subject to automatic
stay
|
140
|
|
1201.
Definitions
|
140
|
|
1202. Adjustment of dollar amounts
|
141
|
|
1203. Extension of time
|
142
|
|
1204. Technical amendments
|
142
|
|
1205. Penalty for persons who negligently or fraudulently prepare bankruptcy
petitions
|
142
|
|
1206. Limitation on compensation of professional persons
|
142
|
|
1207. Effect of conversion
|
142
|
|
1208. Allowance of administrative expenses
|
142
|
|
1209. Exceptions to discharge
|
142
|
|
1210. Effect of discharge
|
143
|
|
1211. Protection against discriminatory treatment
|
143
|
|
1212. Property of the estate
|
143
|
|
1213.
Preferences
|
143
|
|
1214. Postpetition transactions
|
144
|
|
1215. Disposition of Property of the Estate
|
144
|
|
1216. General provisions
|
144
|
|
1217. Abandonment of railroad line
|
144
|
|
1218. Contents of plan
|
145
|
|
1219.
Bankruptcy cases and proceedings
|
145
|
|
1220. Knowing disregard of bankruptcy law or rule
|
145
|
|
1221. Transfers made by nonprofit charitable corporations
|
145
|
|
1222. Protection of valid purchase money security interests
|
145
|
|
1223.
Bankruptcy Judgeship
|
145
|
|
1224. Compensating trustees
|
146
|
|
1225. Amendment to section 362 of title 11, United States Code
|
146
|
|
1226. Judicial education
|
146
|
|
1227.
Reclamation
|
146
|
|
1228. Providing requested tax documents to the court
|
146
|
|
1229. Encouraging creditworthiness
|
147
|
|
1230. Property no longer subject to redemption
|
147
|
|
1231.
Trustees.
|
147
|
|
1232.
Bankruptcy forms
|
148
|
|
1233. Direct appeals of bankruptcy matters to courts of appeals
|
148
|
|
1234. Involuntary cases
|
149
|
|
1235. Federal election law fines and penalties as nondischargeable debt
|
149
|
|
1301. Enhanced disclosures under an open end credit plan
|
149
|
|
1302. Enhanced disclosure for credit extensions secured by a dwelling
|
150
|
|
1303. Disclosures related to "introductory rates"
|
150
|
|
1304. Internet-based credit card solicitations
|
152
|
|
1305. Disclosures related to late payment deadlines and penalties
|
152
|
|
1306. Prohibition on certain actions for failure to incur finance charges
|
152
|
|
1307. Dual use debit card
|
153
|
|
1308. Study of bankruptcy impact of credit extended to dependent students
|
153
|
|
1309. Clarification of clear and conspicuous
|
153
|
|
1401. Employee wage and benefit priorities
|
154
|
|
1402. Fraudulent transfers and obligations
|
154
|
|
1403. Payment of insurance benefits to retired employees
|
154
|
|
1404. Debts nondischargeable if incurred in violation of securities
fraud laws
|
154
|
|
1405. Appointment of trustee in cases of suspected fraud
|
155
|
|
1406. Effective date; application of amendments
|
155
|
|
1501. Effective date; application of amendments
|
155
|
|
1502. Technical corrections
|
155
|
|
Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported
|
155
|
|
CHAPTER 1 —
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
|
156
|
|
§ 101 •.Definitions
|
156
|
|
§ 101(1)
•.Accountant
|
156
|
|
§ 101(2)
•.Affiliate
|
156
|
|
§ 101(3)
•.Assisted
person
|
156
|
|
§ 101(4)
•.Attorney
|
156
|
|
§ 101(4A)
•.Bankruptcy
Assistance
|
156
|
|
§ 101(5)
•.Claim
|
156
|
|
§ 101(6)
•.Commodity
Broker
|
156
|
|
§ 101(7)
•.Community
Claim
|
157
|
|
§ 101(7A)
•.Commercial
Fishing Operation
|
157
|
|
§ 101(7B)
•.Commercial
Fishing Vessel
|
157
|
|
§ 101(8)
•.Consumer
Debt
|
157
|
|
§ 101(9)
•.Corporation
|
157
|
|
§ 101(10)
•.Creditor
|
157
|
|
§ 101(10A)
•.Current
Monthly Income
|
157
|
|
§ 101(11)
•.Custodian
|
158
|
|
§ 101(12)
•.Debt
|
158
|
|
§ 101(12A)
•.Debt
for Child Support (Old)
|
158
|
|
§ 101(12A)
•.Debt
Relief Agency (New)
|
158
|
|
§ 101(13)
•.Debtor
|
158
|
|
§ 101(13A)
•.Debtor's
Principal Residence
|
158
|
|
§ 101(14)
•.Disinterested
Person (Old)
|
158
|
|
§ 101(14)
•.Disinterested
Person (New)
|
159
|
|
§ 101(14A)
•.Domestic
Support Obligation
|
159
|
|
§ 101(15)
•.Entity
|
159
|
|
§ 101(16)
•.Equity
Security
|
159
|
|
§ 101(17)
•.Equity
Security Holder
|
160
|
|
§ 101(18)
•.Family
Farmer
|
160
|
|
§ 101(19)
•.Family
Farmer with Regular Annual Income
|
161
|
|
§ 101(19A)
•.Family
Fisherman
|
161
|
|
§ 101(19B)
•.Family
Fisherman with Regular Annual Income
|
161
|
|
§ 101(20)
•.Farmer
|
161
|
|
§ 101(21)
•.Farming
Operation
|
161
|
|
§ 101(21A)
•.Farmout
Agreement
|
161
|
|
§ 101(21B)
•.Federal
Depository Institutions Regulatory Agency
|
162
|
|
§ 101(22)
•.Financial
Institution (Old)
|
162
|
|
§ 101(23)
•.Foreign
Proceeding (Old)
|
162
|
|
§ 101(24)
•.Foreign
Representative (Old)
|
162
|
|
§ 101(22)
•.Financial
Institution (New)
|
162
|
|
§ 101(22A)
•.Financial
Participant
|
162
|
|
§ 101(23)
•.Foreign
Proceeding (New)
|
162
|
|
§ 101(24)
•.Foreign
Representative (New)
|
163
|
|
§ 101(25)
•.Forward
Contract
|
163
|
|
§ 101(26)
•.Forward
Contract Merchant (Old)
|
164
|
|
§ 101(26)
•.Forward
Contract Merchant (New)
|
164
|
|
§ 101(27)
•.Governmental
Unit
|
164
|
|
§ 101(27A)
•.Health
Care Business
|
164
|
|
§ 101(27B)
•.Incidental
Property
|
165
|
|
§ 101(28)
•.Indenture
|
165
|
|
§ 101(29)
•.Indenture
Trustee
|
165
|
|
§ 101(30)
•.Individual
with Regular Income
|
165
|
|
§ 101(31)
•.Insider
|
165
|
|
§ 101(32)
•.Insolvent
|
165
|
|
§ 101(33)
•.Institution-affiliated
Party
|
165
|
|
§ 101(34)
•.Insured
Credit Union
|
165
|
|
§ 101(35)
•.Insured
Depository Institution
|
165
|
|
§ 101(35A)
•
Intellectual Property
|
165
|
|
§ 101(36)
•
Judicial Lien
|
166
|
|
§ 101(37)
•
Lien
|
166
|
|
§ 101(38)
•
Margin Payment
|
166
|
|
§ 101(38A)
•
Master Netting Agreement
|
166
|
|
§ 101(38B)
•
Master Netting Agreement Participant
|
166
|
|
§ 101(39)
•
Mask Work
|
166
|
|
§ 101(39A)
•
Median Family Income
|
166
|
|
§ 101(40)
•
Municipality
|
166
|
|
§ 101(40A)
•
Patient
|
166
|
|
§ 101(40B)
•
Patient Records
|
166
|
|
§ 101(41)
•
Person
|
167
|
|
§ 101(41A)
•
Personally Identifiable Information
|
167
|
|
§ 101(42)
•
Petition
|
167
|
|
§ 101(42A)
•
Production Payment
|
167
|
|
§ 101(43)
•
Purchaser
|
167
|
|
§ 101(44)
•
Railroad
|
167
|
|
§ 101(45)
•
Relative
|
167
|
|
§ 101(46)
•
Repo Participant
|
168
|
|
§ 101(47)
•
Repurchase Agreement
(Old)
|
168
|
|
§ 101(47)
•
Repurchase Agreement
(New)
|
168
|
|
§ 101(48)
•
Securities Clearing Agency
|
169
|
|
§ 101(48A)
•
Securities Self Regulatory Organization
|
169
|
|
§ 101(49)
•
Security
|
169
|
|
§ 101(50)
•
Security Agreement
|
169
|
|
§ 101(51)
•
Security Interest
|
169
|
|
§ 101(51A)
•
Settlement Payment
|
169
|
|
§ 101(51B)
•
Single Asset Real Estate
|
169
|
|
§ 101(51C)
•
Small Business
(Old)
|
170
|
|
§ 101(51C)
•
Small Business Case (New)
|
170
|
|
§ 101(51D)
•
Small Business Debtor
|
170
|
|
§ 101(52)
•
State
|
170
|
|
§ 101(53)
•
Statutory Lien
|
170
|
|
§ 101(53A)
•
Stockbroker
|
170
|
|
§ 101(53B)
•
Swap Agreement (Old)
|
170
|
|
§ 101(53B)
•
Swap Agreement (New)
|
171
|
|
§ 101(53C)
•
Swap Participant
|
172
|
|
§ 101(56A)
•
Term Overriding Royalty
|
172
|
|
§ 101(53D)
•
Timeshare Plan
|
172
|
|
§ 101(54)
•
Transfer (Old)
|
172
|
|
§ 101(54)
•
Transfer (New)
|
173
|
|
§ 101(54A)
•
Uninsured State Member Bank
|
173
|
|
§ 101(55)
•
United States
|
173
|
|
§ 103.
Applicability of chapters
|
173
|
|
§ 104.
Adjustment of dollar amounts
|
173
|
|
§ 105.
Power of court
|
174
|
|
§ 107.
Public access to papers
|
174
|
|
§ 108.
Extension of time
|
174
|
|
§ 109.
Who may be a debtor
|
175
|
|
§ 110.
Penalty for persons who negligently or fraudulently
prepare bankruptcy petitions
|
176
|
|
§ 111.
Nonprofit budget and credit counseling agencies;
financial management instructional courses
|
180
|
|
§ 112.
Prohibition on disclosure of name of minor children
|
183
|
|
CHAPTER 3 —
CASE
ADMINISTRATION
|
184
|
|
§ 301.
Voluntary cases
|
184
|
|
§ 303.
Involuntary cases
|
184 |
|
[§ 304.
Cases ancillary to foreign proceedings]
|
185 |
|
§ 305.
Abstention
|
186 |
|
§ 306.
Limited appearance
|
186 |
|
§ 308.
Debtor reporting requirements
|
186 |
|
§ 328.
Limitation on compensation of professional persons
|
187 |
|
§ 330.
Compensation of officers
|
187 |
|
§ 332.
Consumer privacy ombudsman
|
188 |
|
§ 333.
Appointment of patient care ombudsman
|
188 |
|
§ 341.
Meetings of creditors and equity security holders
|
189 |
|
§ 342.
Notice
|
189 |
|
§ 346.
Special provisions related to the treatment of
State and local taxes (Old)
|
191 |
|
§ 346.
Special provisions related to the treatment of
State and local taxes (New)
|
194 |
|
§ 348.
Effect of conversion
|
196 |
|
§ 351.
Disposal of patient records
|
197 |
|
§ 362.
Automatic stay
|
198 |
|
§ 363.
Use, sale, or lease of property
|
209 |
|
§ 365.
Executory contracts and unexpired leases
|
210 |
|
§ 366.
Utility service
|
213 |
|
CHAPTER 5 —
CREDITORS,
THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE
|
214 |
|
§ 501.
Filing of proofs of claims or interests
|
215 |
|
§ 502.
Allowance of claims or interests
|
215 |
|
§ 503.
Allowance of administrative expenses
|
216 |
|
§ 504.
Sharing of compensation
|
219 |
|
§ 505.
Determination of tax liability
|
219 |
|
§ 506.
Determination of secured status
|
220 |
|
§ 507.
Priorities
|
220 |
|
§ 508.
Effect of distribution other than under this title
|
223 |
|
§ 511.
Rate of interest on tax claims
|
224 |
|
§ 521.
Debtor's duties
|
224 |
|
§ 522.
Exemptions
|
228 |
|
§ 523.
Exceptions to discharge
|
233 |
|
§ 524.
Effect of discharge
|
237 |
|
§ 525.
Protection against discriminatory treatment
|
244 |
|
§ 526.
Restrictions on debt relief agencies
|
244 |
|
§ 527.
Disclosures
|
246 |
|
§ 528.
Requirements for debt relief agencies
|
248 |
|
§ 541.
Property of the estate
|
248 |
|
§ 545.
Statutory liens
|
251 |
|
§ 546.
Limitations on avoiding powers
|
251 |
|
§ 547.
Preferences
|
253 |
|
§ 548.
Fraudulent transfers and obligations
|
254 |
|
§ 549.
Postpetition transactions
|
256 |
|
§ 552.
Postpetition effect of security interest
|
256 |
|
§ 553.
Setoff
|
257 |
|
§ 555.
Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or
accelerate a securities contract
|
257 |
|
§ 556.
Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or
accelerate a commodities contract or forward contract
|
258 |
|
§ 559.
Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or
accelerate a repurchase agreement
|
258 |
|
§ 560.
Contractual right to liquidate, terminate, or
accelerate a swap agreement
|
260 |
|
§ 561.
Contractual right to terminate, liquidate, accelerate,
or offset under a master netting agreement and across contracts; proceedings
under chapter 15
|
260 |
|
§ 562.
Timing of damage measurement in connection with
swap agreements, securities contracts, forward contracts, commodity
contracts, repurchase agreements, and master netting agreements
|
261 |
|
CHAPTER 7 —
LIQUIDATION
|
262 |
|
§ 704.
Duties of trustee
|
262 |
|
§ 706.
Conversion
|
264 |
|
§ 707.
Dismissal of a case or conversion to a case under
chapter 11 or 13
|
264 |
|
§ 722.
Redemption
|
270 |
|
§ 724.
Treatment of certain liens
|
270 |
|
§ 726.
Distribution of property of the estate
|
271 |
|
§ 727.
Discharge
|
271 |
|
[§ 728.
Special tax provisions]
|
272 |
|
§ 741.
Definitions for this subchapter
|
273 |
|
§ 752.
Customer property
|
274 |
|
§ 753.
Stockbroker liquidation and forward contract merchants,
commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions, financial participants,
securities clearing agencies, swap participants, repo participants,
and master netting agreement participants
|
275 |
|
§ 761.
Definitions for this subchapter
|
275 |
|
§ 766.
Treatment of customer property
|
276 |
|
§ 767.
Commodity broker liquidation and forward contract
merchants, commodity brokers, stockbrokers, financial institutions,
financial participants, securities clearing agencies, swap participants,
repo participants, and master netting agreement participants
|
276 |
|
CHAPTER
9 —
ADJUSTMENT OF DEBTS OF A MUNICIPALITY
|
276 |
|
§ 901.
Applicability of other sections of this title
|
277 |
|
§ 921.
Petition and proceedings relating to petition
|
277 |
|
§ 943.
Confirmation
|
277 |
|
CHAPTER 11 —
REORGANIZATION
|
277 |
|
§ 1102.
Creditors' and equity security holders' committees
|
278 |
|
§ 1104.
Appointment of trustee or examiner
|
278 |
|
§ 1106.
Duties of trustee and examiner
|
279 |
|
§ 1112.
Conversion or dismissal
|
280 |
|
§ 1114.
Payment of insurance benefits to retired employees
|
282 |
|
§ 1115.
Property of the estate
|
283 |
|
§ 1116.
Duties of trustee or debtor in possession in small
business cases
|
283 |
|
§ 1121.
Who may file a plan
|
284 |
|
§ 1123.
Contents of plan
|
285 |
|
§ 1124.
Impairment of claims or interests
|
285 |
|
§ 1125.
Postpetition disclosure and solicitation
|
286 |
|
§ 1127.
Modification of plan
|
287 |
|
§ 1129.
Confirmation of plan
|
287 |
|
§ 1141.
Effect of confirmation
|
289 |
|
§ 1146.
Special tax provisions
|
290 |
|
§ 1170.
Abandonment of railroad line
|
291 |
|
§ 1172.
Contents of plan
|
291 |
|
CHAPTER 12 —
ADJUSTMENT
OF DEBTS OF A FAMILY FARMER OR FISHERMAN WITH REGULAR ANNUAL INCOME
|
291 |
|
§ 1202.
Trustee
|
291 |
|
§ 1203.
Rights and powers of debtor
|
292 |
|
§ 1206.
Sales free of interests
|
292 |
|
§ 1208.
Conversion or dismissal
|
292 |
|
§ 1222.
Contents of plan
|
293 |
|
§ 1225.
Confirmation of plan
|
294 |
|
§ 1226.
Payments
|
295 |
|
§ 1228.
Discharge
|
295 |
|
§ 1229.
Modification of plan after confirmation
|
295 |
|
§ 1231.
Special tax provisions
|
296 |
|
CHAPTER
13—
ADJUSTMENT
OF DEBTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITH REGULAR INCOME
|
296 |
|
§ 1302.
Trustee
|
296 |
|
§ 1307.
Conversion or dismissal
|
297 |
|
§ 1308.
Filing of prepetition tax returns
|
298 |
|
§ 1322.
Contents of plan
|
299 |
|
§ 1324.
Confirmation hearing
|
300 |
|
§ 1325.
Confirmation of plan
|
300 |
|
§ 1326.
Payments
|
303 |
|
§ 1328.
Discharge
|
304 |
|
§ 1329.
Modification of plan after confirmation
|
306 |
|
CHAPTER 15 —
ANCILLARY
AND OTHER CROSS-BORDER CASES
|
306 |
|
§ 1501.
Purpose and scope of application
|
307 |
|
§ 1502.
Definitions
|
308 |
|
§ 1503.
International obligations of the United States
|
309 |
|
§ 1504.
Commencement of ancillary case
|
309 |
|
§ 1505.
Authorization to act in a foreign country
|
309 |
|
§ 1506.
Public policy exception
|
309 |
|
§ 1507.
Additional assistance
|
309 |
|
§ 1508.
Interpretation
|
309 |
|
§ 1509.
Right of direct access
|
310 |
|
§ 1510.
Limited jurisdiction
|
310 |
|
§ 1511.
Commencement of case under section 301 or 303
|
310 |
|
§ 1512.
Participation of a foreign representative in a
case under this title
|
310 |
|
§ 1513.
Access of foreign creditors to a case under this
title
|
311 |
|
§ 1514.
Notification to foreign creditors concerning a
case under this title
|
311 |
|
§ 1515.
Application for recognition
|
311 |
|
§ 1516.
Presumptions concerning recognition
|
312 |
|
§ 1517.
Order granting recognition
|
312 |
|
§ 1518.
Subsequent information
|
313 |
|
§ 1519.
Relief that may be granted upon filing petition
for recognition
|
313 |
|
§ 1520.
Effects of recognition of a foreign main proceeding
|
313 |
|
§ 1521.
Relief that may be granted upon recognition
|
314 |
|
§ 1522.
Protection of creditors and other interested persons
|
315 |
|
§ 1523.
Actions to avoid acts detrimental to creditors
|
316 |
|
§ 1524.
Intervention by a foreign representative
|
316 |
|
§ 1525.
Cooperation and direct communication between the
court and foreign courts or foreign representatives
|
316 |
|
§ 1526.
Cooperation and direct communication between the
trustee and foreign courts or foreign representatives
|
316 |
|
§ 1527.
Forms of cooperation
|
316 |
|
§ 1528.
Commencement of a case under this title after
recognition of a foreign main proceeding
|
316 |
|
§ 1529.
Coordination of a case under this title and a
foreign proceeding
|
317 |
|
§ 1530.
Coordination of more than 1 foreign proceeding
|
317 |
|
§ 1531.
Presumption of insolvency based on recognition
of a foreign main proceeding
|
317 |
|
§ 1532.
Rule of payment in concurrent proceedings
|
317 |
|
TITLE 18 —
CRIMES
AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
|
318 |
|
§ 156.
Knowing disregard of bankruptcy law or rule
|
318 |
|
§ 157.
Bankruptcy fraud
|
318 |
|
§ 158.
Designation of United States attorneys and agents
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to address abusive reaffirmations
of debt and materially fraudulent statements in bankruptcy schedules
|
319 |
|
TITLE 28 —
JUDICIARY
AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
|
319 |
|
§ 152.
Appointment of bankruptcy judges
|
319 |
|
§ 157.
Procedures
|
320 |
|
§ 158.
Appeals
|
320 |
|
§ 159.
Bankruptcy statistics
|
321 |
|
§ 586.
Duties; supervision by Attorney General
|
323 |
|
§ 589a.
United States Trustee System Fund
|
325 |
|
§ 589b.
Bankruptcy data
|
326 |
|
§ 960.
Tax liability
|
327 |
|
§ 1334.
Bankruptcy cases and proceedings
|
328 |
|
§ 1409.
Venue of proceedings arising under title 11 or
arising in or related to cases under title 11
|
329 |
|
§ 1410.
Venue of cases ancillary to foreign proceedings
(Old)
|
329 |
|
§ 1410.
Venue of cases ancillary to foreign proceedings
(New)
|
329 |
|
§ 1930.
Bankruptcy fees
|
329 |
|
§ 2075.
Bankruptcy rules
|
330 |
|
SECTION 406 OF THE JUDICIARY APPROPRIATIONS ACT,
1990
|
331 |
|
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT
|
331 |
|
FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACT
|
344 |
|
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT
ACT OF 1991
|
356 |
|
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 1970
|
360 |
|
SECTION 302 OF THE BANKRUPTCY JUDGES, UNITED STATES
TRUSTEES, AND FAMILY FARMER BANKRUPTCY ACT OF 1986
|
361 |
|
TRUTH IN LENDING ACT
|
361 |
|
Committee Jurisdiction Letters
|
370
|
|
Markup Transcript
|
373
|
|
Sensenbrenner — opening remarks
|
373
|
|
Conyers — opening remarks
|
374
|
|
Conyers amendment — pay day loans made to servicemembers (roll call)
|
376
|
|
Watt and Delahunt amendment — prohibition against usury (roll call)
|
394
|
|
Watt amendment — postsecondary education expenses (roll call)
|
402
|
|
Bush Plan Cuts College
Aid for 500,000 (article)
|
407
|
|
Nadler amendment — nondischarge of debts related to civil rights violations
(withdrawn)
|
418
|
|
Nadler amendment — extension of time to assume or reject nonresidential
real property (roll call)
|
422
|
|
Schiff amendment — no BC § 707(b)(2) dismissal for identity theft victims
(roll call)
|
432
|
|
Delahunt amendment — avoidance of transfers made within 10 years of
the bankruptcy filing to an asset protection trust (BC § 548) (roll
call)
|
445
|
|
Berman & Meehan — exemption for medically distressed debtors (BC § 522)
(roll call)
|
453
|
|
Prepared Statement of Zoe Lofgren
|
458
|
|
U.S. Attorney letter to
Rep. Grassley re: U.S. Trustee data on medical debts
|
460
|
|
Nadler amendment — nondischarge of debts related to civil rights violations
(BC § 523(a) (resubmitted) (roll call)
|
467
|
|
Scott amendment — no 707(b)(2) dismissal if substantial portion of debt
related to illness (voice vote only)
|
474
|
|
Scott amendment — no 707(b)(2) dismissal if substantial portion of debt
related to (1) business losses incurred by a spouse or (2) unforeseen
loss of employment (voice vote only)
|
477
|
|
Meehan amendment — no 707(b)(2) dismissal for certain disabled veterans
(roll call)
|
481
|
|
Schiff amendment — GAO study relating to Child Support Payments (withdrawn)
|
488
|
|
National Child Support
Enforcement Letter: Child Centered Reforms in H.R. 333
|
492
|
|
Jackson Lee amendment — increase expense allowance for private schools
(roll call)
|
493
|
|
Washington Post: A Bankruptcy Reform
|
496
|
|
Jackson Lee amendment — exclude funds received as a result of a natural
disaster as expenses for means testing expenses (voice vote only)
|
500
|
|
Jackson Lee en bloc amendments — debts related to (1) sex offenses against
minors; (2) tobacco claims (BC 523(a)(roll call)
|
502
|
|
Waters en bloc amendments — (1) no relief from stay to evict victims
of domestic violence (BC § 362(b)(22); (2) exemptions for the elderly
(BC § 522(r); (3) issuance of credit cards to underage consumers (15
U.S.C. § 1637(c))(voice vote only)
|
511
|
|
Watt en bloc amendments — (1) eliminate requirement for debtor's attorney
to certify accuracy of schedules; (2) correct provisions requiring attorney
to identify themselves as debt relief agencies; (3) prevent sale of
personal consumer information on the eve of a corporate bankruptcy (voice
vote only)
|
517
|
|
Prepared Statement of the Maxine Waters — 1
|
524
|
|
Prepared Statement of the Maxine Waters — 2
|
525
|
|
Prepared Statement of the Maxine Waters — 3
|
525
|
|
ABA letter re: attorney certification requirements
|
526
|
|
Motion to report S. 256
favorably
|
533
|
|
|
The
Table of Contents has been expanded beyond that contained in the original PDF version
issued by the U.S. Government Printing Office. In all other respects, this
version is identical to the official PDF version. The pagination of the official
PDF version has been retained.
|
|
PURPOSE
AND SUMMARY
S. 256, the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
and Consumer Protection Act of 2005," is a comprehensive package of reform
measures pertaining to both consumer and business bankruptcy cases. The
purpose of the bill is to improve bankruptcy law and practice by restoring
personal responsibility and integrity in the bankruptcy system and ensure
that the system is fair for both
debtors
and creditors.
With respect to the interests of
creditors,
the proposed reforms respond to many of the factors contributing to the
increase in consumer bankruptcy filings, such as lack of personal financial
accountability, 1
the proliferation of serial filings, and the absence of effective oversight
to eliminate abuse in the system. The heart of the bill's consumer bankruptcy
reforms consists of the implementation of an income/expense screening mechanism
("needs-based bankruptcy relief" or "means testing"), which is intended
to ensure that
debtors
repay creditors
the maximum they can afford. S. 256
also establishes new eligibility standards for consumer bankruptcy relief
and includes
provisions intended to deter serial and abusive bankruptcy filings. It substantially
augments the responsibilities of those charged with administering consumer
bankruptcy cases as well as those who counsel
debtors
with respect to obtaining such relief. In addition, the bill caps the amount
of homestead equity a
debtor may
shield from
creditors, under certain circumstances.
S. 256 also
includes
various consumer protection reforms. The bill penalizes a
creditor
who unreasonably refuses to negotiate a pre-bankruptcy debt repayment plan
with a debtor.
It strengthens the disclosure requirements for reaffirmation agreements
(agreements by which
debtors
obligate themselves to repay otherwise dischargeable debts) so that
debtors
will be better informed about their rights and responsibilities. The legislation
requires certain monthly credit card billing statements to include specified
explanatory statements regarding the increased amount of interest and repayment
time associated with making minimum payments. The bill requires certain
home equity loan and credit card solicitations to include enhanced consumer
disclosures. It also prohibits a
creditor
from terminating an open end consumer credit plan simply because the consumer
has not incurred finance charges on the account.
S. 256 allows
debtors
to shelter from the
claims of
creditors
certain education IRA plans and retirement pension funds. It requires
debtors
to receive credit counseling before they can be eligible for bankruptcy
relief so that they will make an informed choice about bankruptcy, its alternatives,
and consequences. The bill also re-
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
1. As one academic explained:
[S]hoplifting is wrong; bankruptcy is also a
moral act. Bankruptcy is a moral as well as an economic act. There is a
conscious decision not to keep one's promises. It is a decision not to reciprocate
a benefit received, a good deed done on the promise that you will reciprocate.
Promise-keeping and reciprocity are the foundation of an economy and healthy
civil society.
Bankruptcy Reform: Joint Hearing Before
the Subcomm. on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House Comm. on
the Judiciary and the Subcomm. on Administrative Oversight and the Courts
of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary,106th Cong.
98 (1999) (statement of Prof. Todd Zywicki)
|

|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
quires
debtors,
after they have filed for bankruptcy, to participate in financial management
instructional courses so they can hopefully avoid future financial distress.
With respect to business bankruptcy,
S. 256 includes
several significant provisions intended to heighten administrative scrutiny
and judicial oversight of small business bankruptcy cases, which often are
the least likely to reorganize successfully. In addition, it contains provisions designed to reduce systemic risk in the financial marketplace, the enactment
of which Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan described as being
"extremely important."
2
The bill includes
heightened protections for
family farmers
facing financial distress and allows
family fishermen
to qualify for a specialized form of bankruptcy relief currently available
only to family
farmers. The bill also
includes
provisions concerning transnational insolvencies, bankrupt health care providers,
the treatment of tax
claims, and
data collection. In response to the exponential increase in bankruptcy filings,
the bill authorizes the creation of 28 additional bankruptcy judgeships.
|

|
|
BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION
On February 1, 2005, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) (for himself and seven
original cosponsors) introduced S. 256,
the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005." Thereafter,
F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr., Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary,
(for himself and 60 original cosponsors) introduced legislation (H.R. 685)
identical to S. 256 on February 9,
2005.
S. 256, as introduced, is substantively
identical to legislation that the House passed in the prior Congress on
two separate occasions with overwhelming bipartisan support.
3
It is also substantively similar to a modified version of a bankruptcy reform
conference report that the House passed in the 107th Congress by a vote
of 244 to 116. 4
|

|
|
FACTORS SUPPORTING BANKRUPTCY REFORM
Representing the most comprehensive set of reforms in more than 25 years,
S. 256's consumer bankruptcy provisions
respond to several factors. First, the recent escalation of consumer bankruptcy
filings does not appear to be just a temporary event, but part of a generally
consistent upward trend.
5
In 1998, for example, bankruptcy filings exceeded one million for the first
time in our nation's
|

|
|
|
|
2.
Letter from Alan Greenspan, Chairman, Federal Reserve Board, to F. James
Sensenbrenner, Jr., Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary (Sept. 3, 2002)
(on file with the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law).
|
 |
|
3.
On March 19, 2003, the House passed H.R. 975, the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
and Consumer Prevention Act of 2003," by a vote of 315 to 113. 149 CONG.
REC. H2099-00 (daily ed. Mar. 19, 2003). Thereafter, the House, on January
28, 2004, passed S. 1920, as amended, the text of which was substituted
with the text of H.R. 975, as passed by the House, by a vote of 265 to 99.
150 CONG. REC. H218-19 (daily ed. Jan. 28, 2004).
|

|
|
4.
H.R. Rep. No. 107-617 (2002). The modifications consisted of the deletion
of two provisions, one dealing with unlawful protest activities and the
other authorizing additional bankruptcy judgeships. The text of the conference
report, as modified, was introduced as H.R. 5545, the "Bankruptcy Abuse
Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2003." H.R. 5545, 107th Cong.
(2002). In turn, the text of H.R. 5545 was substituted as an amendment to
H.R. 333. The House, thereafter, passed H.R. 333, as amended . 148 CONG.
REC. H8876-77 (daily ed. Nov. 14, 2002).
|

|
|
5.
Press Release, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Record Breaking
Bankruptcy Filings Reported in Calendar Year 2002, at 1 (Feb. 14, 2003)
(noting that "[b]ankruptcy filings continue to break historic records").
|

|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
history. Over
the past decade, the number of bankruptcy filings has nearly doubled
to more than 1.6 million cases filed in fiscal year 2004.
6
As a result, there is a growing perception that bankruptcy relief may be
too readily available and is sometimes used as a first resort, rather than
a last resort. 7
Despite the view of opponents of bankruptcy reform that abuse in the system
is not widespread and that most bankruptcy filings result from causes beyond
debtors'
control, such as family illness, job loss or disruption, or divorce,
8
the Committee concluded that reforms were nevertheless necessary.
Second,
there are significant losses asserted to be associated with bankruptcy filings.
As one witness explained during the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearing
on S. 256 earlier this year:
Like all other business expenses, when
creditors
are unable to collect debts because of bankruptcy, some of those losses
are inevitably passed on to responsible Americans who live up to their financial
obligations. Every phone bill, electric bill, mortgage, furniture purchase,
medical bill, and car loan contains an implicit bankruptcy "tax" that the
rest of us pay to subsidize those who do not pay their bills. Exactly how
much of these bankruptcy losses is passed on from lenders to consumer borrowers
is unclear, but economics tells us that at least some of it is. We all pay
for bankruptcy abuse in higher down payments, higher interest rates, and
higher costs for goods and services.
9
According to some analyses, the increase in consumer bankruptcy filings
has adverse financial consequences for our nation's economy. For instance,
it was estimated that in 1997 alone more than $44 billion of
debt was
discharged by debtors who filed for bankruptcy relief,
10
a figure when amortized on a yearly basis amounts to a loss of at least
$110 million every day.
11 These losses, according
to one estimate, translate into a $400 annual "tax" on every household in
our nation. 12
In 2003, the Nilson Report (a credit industry newsletter) announced
that issuers of proprietary and general pur-
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
6. See Press Release, Administrative Office
of the U.S. Courts, Bankruptcy Filings Down in Fiscal Year 2004, at 1 (Dec.
3, 2004) (noting that "[d]espite the drop in filings, bankruptcies remain
at historic highs, well above the 1.5 million record first set in 2002");
Becky Yerak, Bankrupt Filings in E. Mich. Skyrocket; High Debt, Slow
Economy Spur 22% Increase in 2002, Biggest Jump in the United States,
THE DETROIT NEWS, Feb. 24, 2003, at 1A (noting that in the Eastern District
of Michigan alone, bankruptcy filings for 2002 increased by 22 percent over
the prior year).
|

|
|
7. See, e.g., Becky Yerak, Bankrupt
Filings in E. Mich. Skyrocket; High Debt, Slow Economy Spur 22% Increase
in 2002, Biggest Jump in the United States, THE DETROIT NEWS, Feb. 24,
2003, at 1A (noting that "[t]he stigma of filing for bankruptcy continues
to abate while, at the same time, lenders impose few if any credit restrictions").
|

|
|
8. See, e.g., Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and
Consumer Protection Act of 2005: Hearing on
S. 256 Before the Senate Comm. on
the Judiciary,109th Cong. (2005) (statement of
Prof. Elizabeth Warren).
|

|
|
9. Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005: Hearing on S.
256 Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary,109th Cong. (2005)
(prepared statement of Prof. Todd Zywicki).
|

|
|
10. Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1998 (Pt. I):
Hearings on H.R. 3150 Before the Subcomm. on Commercial and Administrative
Law of the House Comm. on the Judiciary,105th Cong. 147 (1998) (statement
of Mark Lauritano, Senior Vice President, WEFA, Inc.).
|

|
|
11. Bankruptcy Reform: Joint Hearing Before
the Subcomm. on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House Comm. on
the Judiciary and the Subcomm. on Administrative Oversight and the Courts
of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary,106th Cong. 26 (1999) (statement
of Dean Sheaffer on behalf of the National Retail Federation).
|

|
|
12. Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1998 (Pt. I):
Hearings on H.R. 3150 Before the Subcomm. on Commercial and Administrative
Law of the House Comm. on the Judiciary,105th Cong. 147 (1998) (statement
of Mark Lauritano, Senior Vice President, WEFA, Inc.).
|

|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
pose credit
cards "lost $18.9 billion in 2002 from consumer bankruptcy filings," an
increase of 15.1 percent over the prior year.
13
The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) reported that credit unions,
as of 2002, lost "nearly $3 billion from bankruptcies" since Congress began
its consideration of bankruptcy reform legislation in 1998.
14
CUNA estimates that over 40% of all credit union losses in 2004 will be
bankruptcy-related, and those losses will total approximately $900 million.
15
A third factor motivating comprehensive reform is that the present bankruptcy
system has loopholes and incentives that allow and—sometimes—even encourage
opportunistic personal filings and abuse. A civil enforcement initiative
undertaken in 2002 by the United States Trustee Program (a component of
the Justice Department charged with administrative oversight of bankruptcy
cases) has "consistently identified" such problems as "debtor
misconduct and abuse, misconduct by
attorneys
and other professionals, problems associated with
bankruptcy petition
preparers, and instances where a
debtor's
discharge should be challenged."
16
According to the United States Trustee Program, "Abuse of the system is
more widespread than many would have estimated."
17
Such abuse ultimately hurts consumers as well as
creditors.
A fourth factor relates to the fact that some bankruptcy debtors are able
to repay a significant portion of their debts, according to several studies. 18
Current law, however, has no clear mandate requiring these debtors to repay
their debts. Accordingly, "[w]hile there is a universal agreement among
the courts that an individual
debtor's
ability to repay his or her debts from future earnings is, at the very least,
a factor in determining whether substantial abuse would occur in a chapter
7 case, there are differences
among the courts as to the extent to which they rely on a
debtor's
ability to repay." 19
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Bankruptcy Losses on Cards, THE
NILSON REPORT, Jan. 2003, at 1.
|

|
|
14. John K. McKechnie, III, Letter to
Editor, Credit Union J. 6 (June 24, 2002); see William R. Mapother,
Counseling Could Overturn Losses, CREDIT UNION MAG. 34 (Dec. 2002)
(quoting CUNA President Dan Mica).
|

|
|
15. Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer
Protection Act of 2005: Hearing on S.
256 Before the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary,109th Cong. (2005)
(prepared statement of Kenneth Beine).
|

|
|
16. Antonia G. Darling & Mark A. Redmiles,
Protecting the Integrity of the System: the Civil Enforcement Initiative,
AM. BANKR. INSTITUTE J. 12 (Sept. 2002).
|

|
|
17. J. Christopher Marshall, Civil Enforcement:
An Early Report, JOURNAL OF THE NAT'L ASS'N OF BANKR. TRUSTEES (NABTALK)
39 (Fall 2002).
|

|
|
18. See, e.g., Bankruptcy Reform Act of
1999 (Pt. II): Hearing on H.R. 833 Before the Subcomm. on Commercial and
Administrative Law of the House Comm. on the Judiciary,106th Cong.
298 (1999) (statement of Thomas S. Neubig, Ernst & Young LLP—Policy Economics
and Quantitative Analysis Group, concluding that "large numbers of 1997
U.S. chapter 7 filers have the
ability to repay large portions of their debts"); id. at 228-29 (statement
of Michael E. Staten, Credit Research Center, concluding that "about 25
percent of chapter 7 debtors
could have repaid at least 30 percent of their non-housing debts over a
5-year repayment plan, after accounting for monthly expenses and housing
payments" and that "[a]bout 5 percent of chapter
7 filers appeared capable of
repaying all of their non-housing
debt over
a 5-year plan," although these "calculations assumed income would remain
unchanged relative to expenses over the 5 years"); Marianne B. Culhane &
Michaela M. White, Taking the New Consumer Bankruptcy Model for a Test
Drive: Means-Testing Real Chapter 7 Debtors, 7 AM. BANKR. L. J. 27,
31 (1999) (concluding that 3.6% of sampled debtors "emerged as apparent
can-pays").
|

|
|
19. Robert C. Furr & Marc P. Barmat, 11
U.S.C. Section 707(b)—The
U.S. Trustee's Weapon Against Abuse, NAT'L ASS'N BANKR. TRUSTEES (NABTALK)
11, 14 (Winter 2002-03).
|

|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
PRIOR CONGRESSIONAL
CONSIDERATION OF BANKRUPTCY REFORM
Proposed reforms to bankruptcy law and practice have been under consideration
by Congress for nearly eight years
20
and have generally enjoyed broad support from the business community, banking
and financial services industries as well as other groups such as
family farmers
and child support enforcement agencies. In Congress, support for bankruptcy
reform legislation has likewise been overwhelming, bipartisan and bicameral.
Since the 105th Congress, the House has passed bankruptcy reform legislation
on eight separate occasions. In the 105th Congress, for example, the House
passed both H.R. 3150, the "Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1998," and the conference
report on that bill by veto-proof margins.
21
In the 106th Congress, the House passed H.R. 833, the successor to H.R.
3150, by a veto-proof margin of 313 to 108
22
and agreed to the conference report
23 by
voice vote. 24
Although the Senate subsequently passed this legislation by a vote of 70
to 28, 25
President Clinton pocket-vetoed it. In the 107th Congress, the House again
registered its overwhelming support for bankruptcy reform on two more occasions.
On March 1, 2001, the House passed H.R. 333, the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
and Consumer Protection Act," by a vote of 306 to 108.
26
The House thereafter passed a modified version of the conference report
on H.R. 333, as previously noted.
27
In the last Congress, the House passed H.R. 975, the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
and Consumer Protection Act of 2003," by a vote of 315 to 113 and S. 1920,
which consisted of the text of H.R. 975, as passed by the House, by a vote
of 265 to 99. 28
Likewise, the Senate has on numerous occasions expressed strong bipartisan
support for bankruptcy reform legislation. In the 105th Congress, the Senate
passed bankruptcy reform legislation by a vote of 97 to 1.
29
In the 106th Congress, the Senate passed similar legislation by a vote of
83 to 14 30
and a subsequent conference report by a vote of 70 to 28.
31
In the 107th Congress, the Senate passed a bankruptcy reform bill by a vote
of 82 to 16. 32
Last month, the Senate passed S. 256,
as amended, by a vote of 74 to 25.
33
The Committee and the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law
(Subcommittee), beginning in the 105th Congress, have held a total of 18
days of hearings on the operation of the
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
20.
Comprehensive bankruptcy reform legislation (H.R. 2500, the "Responsible
Borrower Protection Bankruptcy Act") was first formally introduced in the
House on September 18, 1997. H.R. 2500, 105th Cong. (1997).
•

|
|
|
21.44 CONG. REC. H4442 (daily ed. June 10, 1998) (vote on final passage of
H.R. 3150 was 306 to 118); 144 CONG. REC. H10239-40 (daily ed. Oct. 9, 1998)
(vote on final passage of the conference report on H.R. 3150 was 300 to
125). •

|
|
|
22.145 CONG. REC. H2771 (daily ed. May 5, 1999). •

|
|
|
23.
H.R. REP. NO. 106-970 (2000). •

|
|
|
24.146 CONG. REC. H9840 (daily ed. Oct. 12, 2000).
•

|
|
|
25.146 CONG. REC. S11730 (daily ed. Dec. 7, 2000).
•

|
|
|
26.147 CONG. REC. H600-01 (daily ed. Mar. 1, 2001).
•

|
|
|
27.
See supra note 3. •

|
|
|
28.149 CONG. REC. H2099-00 (daily ed. Mar. 19, 2003);150 Cong. Rec. H218-19
(daily ed. Jan. 28, 2004). •

|
|
|
29.144 CONG. REC. S10767 (daily ed. Sept. 23, 1998).
•

|
|
|
30.146 CONG. REC. S255 (daily ed. Feb. 2, 2000). •

|
|
|
31.146 CONG. REC. S11730 (daily ed. Dec. 7, 2000).
•

|
|
|
32.147 CONG. REC. S2379 (daily ed. Mar. 15, 2001).
•

|
|
|
33.151 CONG. REC. S2474 (daily ed. Mar. 10, 2005).
•

|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
bankruptcy
system and the need for reform.
34
Eleven of these hearings were devoted solely to consideration of
S. 256's predecessors, H.R. 3150
(105th Congress), H.R. 833 (106th Congress), H.R. 333 (107th Congress),
and H.R. 975 (108th Congress). Over the course of these hearings, nearly
130 witnesses, representing nearly every major constituency in the bankruptcy
community, testified. With regard to H.R. 833 alone, testimony was received
from 69 witnesses, representing 23 organizations, with additional material
submitted by other groups.
The Senate likewise has held numerous hearings on the subject of bankruptcy
reform and related issues. Since the 105th Congress, the Senate has held
eleven hearings, including a hearing held earlier this year on
S. 256.
35
In fact, the inaugural hearing on H.R.
|

|
|
|
|
34.
The dates and subject matters of these hearings are as follows:
April 16, 1997:
Hearing on the operation of the bankruptcy system
and status report from the National Bankruptcy Review Commission.
April 30, 1997:
Hearing on H.R. 764, the "Bankruptcy Amendments
of 1997," and H.R. 120, the "Bankruptcy Law Technical Corrections Act of
1997."
October 9, 1997:
Hearing on H.R. 2592, the "Private Trustee Reform
Act of 1997" and review of post-confirmation fees in chapter
11 cases.
November 13, 1997:
Hearing on the Report of the National
Bankruptcy
Review Commission.
February 12, 1998:
Hearing on H.R. 2604, the "Religious Liberty
and Charitable Donation Protection Act of 1997."
March 10-11, 18-19, 1998:
Hearings on H.R. 3150, the "Bankruptcy Reform
Act of 1998," H.R. 3146, the "Consumer Lenders and Borrowers
Bankruptcy
Accountability Act of 1998," and H.R. 2500, the "Responsible Borrower Protection
Bankruptcy Act."
March 11-12, 18-19, 1999:
Hearings on H.R. 833, the "Bankruptcy Reform
Act of 1999."
November 2, 1999:
Joint oversight hearing on additional bankruptcy
judgeship needs.
April 11, 2000:
Oversight hearing on the limits on regulatory
powers under the Bankruptcy Code.
February 7-8, 2001:
Hearings on H.R. 333, the "Bankruptcy Abuse
Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2001."
March 4, 2003:
Hearing on H.R. 975, the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
and Consumer Protection Act of 2003" and the need for bankruptcy reform.
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
35.
The Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts
of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary conducted the following hearings:
April 11, 1997:
Hearing on the increase in personal bankruptcies
and the crisis in consumer credit.
August 1, 1997:
Hearing to review the negative impact of bankruptcy
on educational funding.
August 8, 1997:
Hearing regarding bankruptcy laws for
family farmers.
September 22, 1997:
Hearing on the Bankruptcy Code's effect on religious
freedom and a review of the need for additional bankruptcy judgeships.
October 21, 1997:
Hearing to review the recommendations of the
National Bankruptcy Review Commission.
December 7, 1997:
Hearing regarding international bankruptcy laws.
March 11, 1998:
Hearing on S. 1301, "The Consumer
Bankruptcy
Reform Act: Seeking Fair and Practical Solutions to the Consumer
Bankruptcy
Crisis."
May 19, 1998:
Hearing to review business bankruptcy issues.
March 11, 1999:
Hearing on H.R. 833, the "Bankruptcy Reform
Act of 1999," held jointly with the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative
Law of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
November 2, 1999:
Oversight hearing on additional bankruptcy judgeship
needs held jointly with the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative
Law of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
February 10, 2005:
Hearing on
S. 256, the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention
and Consumer Protection Act of 2005."
8
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
833 during
the 106th Congress was held jointly by the Subcommittee together with the
Senate Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts on March
11, 1999, 36
marking the first time in more than 60 years that a bicameral hearing was
held on the subject of bankruptcy reform.
37
It is also important to note that bankruptcy reform legislation is the product
of extensive bipartisan and bicameral negotiation and compromise. For example,
conferees during the 106th Congress spent nearly seven months engaged in
an informal conference to reconcile differences between the House and Senate
passed versions of bankruptcy reform legislation. In the 107th Congress,
conferees formally met on three occasions and
38
ultimately agreed—after an 11-month period of negotiations—to a bipartisan
conference report.
On February 10, 2005, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary held a hearing
on S. 256 that provided an opportunity
to review the reasons why the current bankruptcy system needs reform and
how this legislation would implement those reforms.
39
Testimony was received from eight witnesses, including: Kenneth Beine on
behalf of CUNA; Maria Vullo, a partner with the New York law firm of Paul,
Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; Malcom Bennett on behalf of the
National Multi Housing Council/National Apartment Association; Philip Strauss
on behalf of the National Child Support Enforcement Association; Dave McCall
on behalf of the United Steel Workers of America, AFL-CIO; R. Michael Stewart
Menzies, Sr. on behalf of the Independent Community Bankers of America;
Prof. Elizabeth Warren, Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law at Harvard Law School;
and Prof. Todd J. Zywicki, Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University
Law Center.
Among the matters considered at the hearing were: (1) the adequacy
of the current bankruptcy system with respect to the detection of fraud
and abuse; (2) how abuse and fraud in the current bankruptcy system
impact on American businesses and our nation's citizens generally; (3)
whether the legislation adversely impacts individuals deserving of bankruptcy
relief; (4) whether the
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
36.
Representatives on behalf of the Commercial Law League of America, CUNA,
MBNA America Bank, N.A., National Retail Federation, and the National Consumer
Law Center also testified. Some of the nation's leading jurists and academics
presented testimony as well. Bankruptcy Reform: Hearing Before the Subcomm.
on Commercial and Administrative Law of the House Comm. on the Judiciary
and the Subcomm. on Administrative Oversight and the Courts of the Senate
Comm. on the Judiciary,106th Cong. (1999).
|

|
|
37.
Senators testifying at the hearing included Charles Grassley (R-IA), Joseph
Biden (D-DE) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT). House Members included Jim Moran
(D-VA), Pete Sessions (R-TX) and Nick Smith (R-MI). Id.
•

|
|
|
38.
H.R. REP. NO. 107-617 (2002). Signatories on behalf of the House included:
F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-WI), Henry Hyde (R-IL), George Gekas (R-PA),
Lamar Smith (R-TX), Steve Chabot (R-OH), Bob Barr (R-GA), Rick Boucher (D-VA),
Michael Oxley (R-OH), Spencer Bachus (R-AL), Billy Tauzin (R-LA), Joe Barton
(R-TX), John Boehner (R-OH), and Michael Castle (R-DE). Signatories on behalf
of the Senate included: Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Joe Biden (D-DE), Charles
Schumer (D-NY), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Jon Kyl (R-AZ),
Mike DeWine (R-OH), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), and Mitch McConnell (R-KY).
|

|
|
39.
Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005: Hearing
on S. 256 Before the Subcomm. on
Administrative Oversight and the Courts of the Senate Comm. on the Judiciary,109th Cong. (2005). •

|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
proposed reforms
would assist those who are charged with administrative oversight of bankruptcy
cases and law enforcement matters; and (5) whether, given current
economic circumstances, the need for comprehensive bankruptcy reform still
exists.
On February 17, 2005, the Senate Judiciary Committee marked up
S. 256 and ordered the bill, as amended,
to be favorably reported by a vote of 12 to 5. Over the course of the markup,
five amendments were passed. These amendments consisted of the following:
1. an amendment by Senator Edward Kennedy (D-MA) clarifying that
a debtor's
reasonably necessary expenses for health insurance, disability insurance,
and health savings accounts for the
debtor and
for the debtor's
spouse and dependents are allowed expenses under the bill's needs-based
test;
2. an amendment by Senator Kennedy limiting retention bonuses, severance
pay, and other payments to insiders of the
debtor,
under certain circumstances;
3. an amendment by Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) increasing the
monetary threshold with respect to the venue of a proceeding to recover
a consumer debt;
4. an amendment by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) clarifying that a
debt based
on a Federal or state securities law violation is nondischargeable; and
5. an amendment by Senator Kennedy requiring the United States trustee
to apply to the court for the appointment of a chapter
11 trustee if there are reasonable
grounds to suspect fraud, under certain circumstances.
On March 10, 2005, the Senate passed
S. 256, as amended, by a vote of 74 to 25. Nearly 130 amendments were
filed. Of the amendments that were offered, 24 failed, 24 were withdrawn,
eight were passed either by vote or unanimous consent. The amendments that
were accepted consisted of the following:
1. an amendment by Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) clarifying that the
special circumstances exception to the bill's needs-based test
includes
a debtor
with a serious medical condition or a
debtor on
active duty in the military to the extent these factors justify adjustment
to income or expenses as well as clarifying the safe harbor from the needs-based
test with respect to veterans;
2. an amendment by Senator Leahy restricting public access to certain
personal information regarding an individual contained in bankruptcy case
files to the extent the court finds that disclosure of such information
would create undue risk of identity theft or other unlawful injury to such
individual or the individual's property;
3. an amendment by Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) increasing the filing
fees for chapter 7 and chapter
11 bankruptcy cases, reducing
the filing fees for chapter 13,
and adjusting the allocation of such fees among various governmental entities;
10
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
4. an amendment by Senator Feingold providing for the automatic periodic
adjustment for inflation of certain monetary amounts specified in the
Bankruptcy
Code;
5. an amendment by Senator Feingold authorizing a court to: (a)
seal all public records pertaining to a fraudulent involuntary bankruptcy
petition,
under certain circumstances, (b) prohibit any consumer reporting
agency from issuing any consumer report containing any reference to such
petition;
and (c) expunge all records pertaining to such
petition
upon the expiration of the statute of limitations for the crimes associated
with the filing of a fraudulent involuntary bankruptcy
petition.
It also amends the Federal criminal statute to make it a criminal offense
to file a fraudulent involuntary bankruptcy
petition;
40
6. an amendment by Senator Feingold creating an exception to the
bill's mandatory consumer credit counseling and financial management training
requirements for a
debtor who
is unable to complete these requirements because of incapacity, disability,
or active duty in a military combat zone;
7. an amendment by Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) creating an exception
from the bill's needs-based test for a disabled veteran whose indebtedness
occurred primarily during a period when the individual was on active duty
or performing a homeland defense activity; and
8. an amendment by Senator James Talent (R-MO) authorizing a bankruptcy
trustee to avoid any transfer of property by a
debtor to
a self-settled trust made within ten years preceding the filing of the
debtor's
bankruptcy case if the
debtor is
a beneficiary of such trust and the
debtor made
such transfer with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud a
creditor.
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
HIGHLIGHTS
OF BANKRUPTCY REFORMS
Consumer
Creditor Bankruptcy Protections.
Needs-Based Reforms. Chapter
7 is a form of bankruptcy relief
by which an individual
debtor receives
an immediate unconditional discharge of personal liability for certain debts
in exchange for relinquishing his or her nonexempt assets to a bankruptcy
trustee for liquidation and distribution to
creditors.
41
This "unconditional discharge" in chapter
7 contrasts with the "conditional
discharge" provisions of chapter
13, under which a
debtor commits
to repay some portion of his or her financial obligations in exchange for
retaining nonexempt assets and receiving a broader discharge of debt than
is available under chapter 7.
Allowing consumer debtors in financial distress to choose voluntarily an
"unconditional discharge" has
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
40.
This amendment is similar to legislation considered by the House in the
108th Congress. H.R. 1529, 108th Cong. (2003). The bill was ordered favorably
reported without amendment by the House Judiciary Committee, H.R. REP. NO.
108-110 (2003), and passed by voice vote by the House. 149 CONG. REC. H5104
(daily ed. June 10, 2003). The principal difference between this legislation
and section 332 of the Act is
that the bill would have permitted the court to expunge the case upon dismissal
of the fraudulent involuntary
petition.
|

|
|
41.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, only an individual may obtain
a chapter 7 discharge. Thus,
a corporation
is not eligible to receive a discharge under chapter
7. 11 U.S.C. Sec.
727(a)(1).
•

|
|
|