Union Calendar No. 14

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Rept. 109-31

Part 1

BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND

CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2005


R E P O R T

of the

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

to ac­com­pany

S. 256

to­geth­er with

DISSENTING VIEWS, ADDITIONAL DISSENTING

VIEWS, AND ADDITIONAL MINORITY VIEWS

 

 

APRIL 8, 2005.—Committed to the Com­mit­tee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union and or­dered to be print­ed


Union Calendar No. 14

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Rept. 109-31

Part 1

BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND

CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2005


R E P O R T

of the

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

to ac­com­pany

S. 256

to­geth­er with

DISSENTING VIEWS, ADDITIONAL DISSENTING

VIEWS, AND ADDITIONAL MINORITY VIEWS

 

 

APRIL 8, 2005.—Committed to the Com­mit­tee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union and or­dered to be print­ed 


U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

20–436

WASHINGTON : 2005

20–436

For sale by the Superin­tendent of Doc­u­ments,

U.S. Gov­ern­ment Printing Of­fice In­ter­net: bookstore.gpo.gov

Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP,

Wash­ing­ton, DC 20402–0001

1


Union Calendar No. 14

109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION

}

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

{

Rept. 109-31

Part 1



BANKRUPTCY ABUSE PREVENTION AND

CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT OF 2005


APRIL 8, 2005.—Committed to the Com­mit­tee of the Whole

House on the State of the Union and or­dered to be print­ed 


Mr. Sensenbrenner, from the Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry,

sub­mit­ted the fol­low­ing

R E P O R T

to­geth­er with

DISSENTING VIEWS, ADDITIONAL DISSENTING

VIEWS, AND ADDITIONAL MINORITY VIEWS

[To ac­com­pany S. 256]

[Including cost es­ti­mate of the Congressional Budget Of­fice]

The Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry, to whom was re­ferred the bill (S. 256) to amend ti­tle 11 of the Unit­ed States Code, and for oth­er pur­poses, hav­ing con­sid­ered the same, re­ports fa­vorably there­on with­out amend­ment and recommends that the bill do pass.

CONTENTS

PAGE

Purpose and Sum­ma­ry

2

Background and Need for the Legislation

3

Factors Sup­port­ing Bank­rupt­cy Re­form

3

Pri­or Congressional Consideration of Bank­rupt­cy Re­form

6

Highlights of Bank­rupt­cy Reforms

10

Con­sum­er Cred­i­tor Bank­rupt­cy Protections

10

Needs-Based Reforms

10

Other Reforms Dealing with Abuse

15

Protections for Cred­i­tors—In Gen­er­al

16

Enforcement of Fam­i­ly Sup­port Obligations

16

Protections for Secured Cred­i­tors

17

Protections for Lessors

17

Con­sum­er Debt­or Bank­rupt­cy Protections

17

Highlights of Busi­ness Bank­rupt­cy Reforms

18

Protections Against Excessive Payments To a Debt­or's Insiders and Fraud by a Debt­or's Management

19

Protections for Employees

19

Small Busi­ness/Single As­set Real Estate Debt­ors

19

Fi­nan­cial Contracts

20

Fam­i­ly Farm­ers and Fam­i­ly Fishermen

20

Transna­tion­al Insolvencies

20

Protections for Small Busi­ness Owners

21

Health Care Providers

21

Other Provisions Having Gen­er­al Impact

21

Privacy Protections

21

Additional Bank­rupt­cy Judgeships

21

Miscellaneous Provisions

22

Hear­ings

22

Com­mit­tee Consideration

22

Votes of the Com­mit­tee

22

1. Conyers — pay day loans made to ser­vicemem­bers

22

2. Watt and Delahunt — disal­low­ing cer­tain claims

23

3. Watt — postsecondary ed­u­ca­tion ex­penses

24

4. Nadler — ex­ten­sion of time to as­sume or re­ject non­res­i­den­tial real prop­er­ty

25

5. Schiff — no 707(b)(2) dis­miss­al for iden­ti­ty theft vic­tims

26

6. Delahunt — avoid­ance of trans­fers made with­in 10 years of the bank­rupt­cy fil­ing to an as­set pro­tec­tion trust (BC § 548)

27

7. Berman & Meehan — ex­emp­tion for med­i­cally dis­tressed debt­ors (BC § 522)

27

8. Nadler — nondis­charge of debts re­lated to civ­il rights vi­o­la­tions (BC § 523(a) (resub­mit­ted)

28

9. Meehan — no 707(b)(2) dis­miss­al for cer­tain dis­abled vet­er­ans

29

10. Jackson Lee — in­crease ex­pense al­low­ance for pri­vate schools

30

11. Jackson Lee — en bloc amend­ments - debts re­lated to (1) sex of­fenses against mi­nors; (2) tobacco claims (BC 523(a)

31

12. Mo­tion to re­port S. 256 fa­vorably

32

Com­mit­tee Oversight Find­ings

33

New Budget Au­thor­ity and Tax Expenditures

33

Congressional Budget Of­fice Cost Estimate

33

Sum­ma­ry

34

Major Provisions

34

Estimated Cost to the Fed­er­al Gov­ern­ment

35

Basis of Estimate

36

Spend­ing Sub­ject to Appropriation

37

Means-Testing (Sec­tion 102)

37

Studies by the U.S. Trust­ees, Gov­ern­ment Accountabil­i­ty Of­fice (GAO), and Small Busi­ness Ad­min­is­tra­tion (SBA) (Sec­tions 103, 205, 230, and 443)

37

Debt­or Fi­nan­cial Management Test Training Pro­gram (Sec­tion 105)

38

Cred­it Counseling Cer­ti­fi­ca­tion (Sec­tion 106)

38

Maintenance of Tax Returns (Sec­tion 315)

38

Changes in Bank­rupt­cy Filing Fees (Sec­tions 325 and 418)

38

Current Law Filing Fees

38

Distribution of Filing Fees

39

Fee Waivers

39

U.S. Trust­ee Site Visits in Chap­ter 11 Cases (Sec­tion 439)

39

Compilation and Pub­lication of Bank­rupt­cy Data and Statistics (Sec­tions 601-602)

39

Audit Pro­ce­dures (Sec­tion 603)

40

Additional Judgeships—Sup­port Costs (Sec­tion 1223)

40

Fed­er­al Trade Com­mis­sion Toll-Free Hotline (Sec­tion 1301)

40

Direct Spend­ing and Rev­e­nues

40

Additional Judgeships (Sec­tion 1223)

41

Changes in Bank­rupt­cy Filing Fees (Sec­tions 102, 325, and 418))

41

Tax Provisions (Title VII)

42

Estimated Impact on State, Lo­cal, and Tribal Gov­ern­ments

42

Mandates

42

Other Impacts

42

Domestic Sup­port Obligations

42

Ex­emp­tions

43

Time Lim­its on Tax Collection

43

Taxes and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Ex­penses

43

Tax Return Filing

43

Pri­ority of Payments

44

Municipal Bank­rupt­cy

44

Fuel Tax Claims

44

Single As­set Cases

44

Estimated Impact on the Private Sector

44

Mandates

44

Requirements For Attorneys

45

No­tice and Dis­clo­sure Requirements

45

Pro­hi­bi­tion on Con­sum­er Re­port­ing Agencies

46

Re­quire­ment for Clos­ing Cred­it Accounts

46

Other Impacts on the Private Sector

46

Previous CBO Estimate

46

Estimate Prepared By

47

Estimate Approved By

47

Performance Goals and Objectives

47

Con­sti­tu­tional Au­thor­ity State­ment

47

Sec­tion-by-Sec­tion Analysis and Discussion

47

101. Con­ver­sion

47

102. Dismissal or Con­ver­sion

48

103. Sense of Con­gress and Study

53

104. No­tice of Alternatives

53

105. Debt­or Fi­nan­cial Management Training Test Pro­gram

54

106. Cred­it Counseling

54

107. Sched­ules of Reasonable and Nec­es­sary Ex­penses

56

201. Promo­tion of Alternative Dispute Res­o­lu­tion

57

202. Ef­fect of Discharge

57

203. Discouraging Abuse of Reaf­fir­ma­tion Agree­ment Prac­tices

57

204. Preservation of Claims and Defenses Up­on Sale of Predatory Loans

58

205. GAO Study and Report on Reaf­fir­ma­tion Agree­ment Pro­cess

59

211. Def­i­ni­tion of Domestic Sup­port Obligation

59

212. Pri­orities for Claims for Domestic Sup­port Obligations

59

213. Requirements To Obtain Con­fir­ma­tion and Discharge in Cases Involving Domestic Sup­port Obligations

60

214. Ex­ceptions To Au­to­mat­ic Stay in Domestic Sup­port Pro­ceed­ings

61

215. Nondis­charge­abil­ity of Certain Debts for Alimony, Maintenance, and Sup­port

61

216. Continued Liabil­i­ty of Prop­er­ty

61

217. Pro­tec­tion of Domestic Sup­port Claims Against Pre­ferential Transfer Mo­tions

62

218. Disposable In­come Defined

62

219. Collection of Child Sup­port

62

220. Nondis­charge­abil­ity of Certain Educational Benefits and Loans

62

221. Amend­ments To Discourage Abusive Bank­rupt­cy Filings

62

222. Sense of Con­gress

63

223. Additional Amend­ments to Title 11, Unit­ed States Code

63

224. Pro­tec­tion of Re­tire­ment Savings in Bank­rupt­cy

63

225. Pro­tec­tion of Ed­u­ca­tion Savings in Bank­rupt­cy

65

226. Definitions.

65

227. Restrictions on Debt Re­lief Agencies

66

228. Dis­clo­sures

66

229. Requirements for Debt Re­lief Agencies

66

230. GAO Study

67

231. Pro­tec­tion of Per­son­al­ly Identifiable Infor­ma­tion

67

232. Con­sum­er Privacy Om­buds­man

68

233. Pro­hi­bi­tion on Dis­clo­sure of Name of Minor Children

68

234. Pro­tec­tion of Per­son­al Infor­ma­tion

68

301. Technical Amend­ments

69

302. Discouraging Bad Faith Repeat Filings

69

303. Curbing Abusive Filings

70

304. Debt­or Retention of Per­son­al Prop­er­ty Se­cu­ri­ty

70

305. Re­lief from the Au­to­mat­ic Stay When the Debt­or Does Not Com­plete Intended Surren­der of Con­sum­er Debt Collat­eral

71

306. Giving Secured Cred­i­tors Fair Treatment in Chap­ter 13.Sub­sec­tion

71

307. Domiciliary Requirements for Ex­emp­tions

72

308. Reduction of Homestead Ex­emp­tion for Fraud

72

309. Protecting Secured Cred­i­tors in Chap­ter 13 Cases

73

310. Lim­itation on Luxury Goods.

74

311. Au­to­mat­ic Stay

74

312. Ex­ten­sion of Period Between Bank­rupt­cy Discharges

76

313. Def­i­ni­tion of Household Goods and Antiques

76

314. Debt Incurred To Pay Nondis­charge­able Debts

76

315. Giving Cred­i­tors Fair No­tice in Chap­ters 7 and 13 Cases

77

316. Dismissal for Fail­ure To Timely File Sched­ules or Pro­vide Re­quired Infor­ma­tion

79

317.Ad­e­quate Time To Prepare for Hear­ing on Con­fir­ma­tion of the Plan

79

318. Chap­ter 13 Plans To Have a 5-Year Duration in Certain Cases

79

319. Sense of Con­gress Regarding Expansion of Rule 9011 of the Fed­er­al Rules of Bank­rupt­cy Pro­ce­dure

80

320. Prompt Re­lief from Stay in Individual Cases

80

321. Chap­ter 11 Cases Filed by Individuals

80

322. Lim­itations on Homestead Ex­emp­tion

81

323. Excluding Em­ploy­ee Benefit Plan Participant Contributions and Other Prop­er­ty from the Estate

82

324. Exclusive Jurisdiction in Matters Involving Bank­rupt­cy Professionals

82

325. Unit­ed States Trust­ee Pro­gram Filing Fee Increase

82

326. Sharing of Compensation

83

327. Fair Valuation of Collat­eral

83

328. De­faults Based on Nonmonetary Obligations

83

329. Clarification of Post­pe­ti­tion Wages and Benefits

84

330. Delay of Discharge During Pendency of Certain Pro­ceed­ings

84

331. Lim­itation on Retention Bonuses, Severance Pay, and Certain Other Payments

84

332. Fraudulent Invol­un­tary Bank­rupt­cy

84

401. Ad­e­quate Pro­tec­tion for Investors

86

402. Meetings of Cred­i­tors and Eq­ui­ty Se­cu­ri­ty Holders

86

403. Pro­tec­tion of Refinance of Se­cu­ri­ty Interest

86

404. Ex­ec­u­to­ry Contracts and Unex­pired Leases

86

405. Cred­i­tors and Eq­ui­ty Se­cu­ri­ty Holders Com­mit­tees

87

406. Amend­ment to Sec­tion 546 of Title 11, Unit­ed States Code

87

407. Amend­ments to Sec­tion 330(a) of Title 11, Unit­ed States Code

87

408. Post­pe­ti­tion Dis­clo­sure and Solicitation

87

409. Pref­er­ences.

88

410. Venue of Certain Pro­ceed­ings

88

411. Period for Filing Plan un­der Chap­ter 11

88

412. Fees Arising from Certain Own­er­ship Interests

88

413. Cred­i­tor Rep­res­en­ta­tion at First Meeting of Cred­i­tors

88

414. Def­i­ni­tion of Disin­ter­ested Per­son

89

415. Factors for Compensation of Professional Per­sons

89

416. Ap­point­ment of Elected Trust­ee

89

417. Util­i­ty Ser­vice. Sec­tion

89

418. Bank­rupt­cy Fees

89

419. More Com­plete Infor­ma­tion Regarding As­sets of the Estate

90

431. Flexible Rules for Dis­clo­sure State­ment and Plan

90

432. Definitions

90

433. Standard Form Dis­clo­sure State­ment and Plan

91

434.Un­i­form Na­tion­al Re­port­ing Requirements

91

435.Un­i­form Re­port­ing Rules and Forms for Small Busi­ness Cases

91

436. Duties in Small Busi­ness Cases

91

437. Plan Filing and Con­fir­ma­tion Deadlines

92

438. Plan Con­fir­ma­tion Deadline

92

439. Duties of the Unit­ed States Trust­ee

92

440. Scheduling Con­fer­ences

93

441. Serial Filer Provisions

93

442. Expanded Grounds for Dismissal or Con­ver­sion and Ap­point­ment of Trust­ee

94

443. Study of Operation of Title 11, Unit­ed States Code, with Respect to Small Businesses

95

444. Payment of Interest

95

445. Pri­ority for Ad­min­is­tra­tive Ex­penses

96

446. Duties with Respect to a Debt­or Who Is a Plan Ad­min­is­tra­tor of an Em­ploy­ee Benefit Plan

96

447. Ap­point­ment of Com­mit­tee of Retired Employees

96

501. Pe­ti­tion and Pro­ceed­ings Related to Pe­ti­tion

96

502. Ap­pli­ca­bil­i­ty of Other Sec­tions to Chap­ter 9

96

601. Improved Bank­rupt­cy Statistics

97

602. Un­i­form Rules for the Collection of Bank­rupt­cy Data

98

603. Audit Pro­ce­dures

98

604. Sense of Con­gress Regarding Availabil­i­ty of Bank­rupt­cy Data

99

701. Treatment of Certain Tax Liens

100

702. Treatment of Fuel Tax Claims

100

703.No­tice of Request for a Deter­mi­na­tion of Taxes

100

704. Rate of Interest on Tax Claims

101

705. Pri­ority of Tax Claims

101

706. Pri­ority Prop­er­ty Taxes Incurred

101

707. No Discharge of Fraudulent Taxes in Chap­ter 13

101

708. No Discharge of Fraudulent Taxes in Chap­ter 11

102

709. Stay of Tax Pro­ceed­ings Lim­ited to Prepe­ti­tion Taxes

102

710. Periodic Payment of Taxes in Chap­ter 11 Cases

102

711. Avoidance of Statutory Liens Prohibited

102

712. Payment of Taxes in the Conduct of Busi­ness

102

713. Tardily Filed Pri­ority Tax Claims

103

714. In­come Tax Returns Prepared by Tax Authorities

103

715. Discharge of the Estate's Liabil­i­ty for Unpaid Taxes

103

716. Re­quire­ment to File Tax Returns to Confirm Chap­ter 13 Plans

104

717. Stan­dards for Tax Dis­clo­sure

104

718. Setoff of Tax Refunds

104

719. Special Provisions Related to the Treatment of State and Lo­cal Taxes

105

720. Dismissal for Fail­ure to Timely File Tax Returns

105

801. Amend­ment to add chap­ter 15 to ti­tle 11, Unit­ed States Code

105

1501. Purpose and scope of ap­pli­ca­tion

106

1502. Definitions

107

1503. In­ter­na­tion­al ob­li­ga­tions of the Unit­ed States

107

1504. Commencement of an­cil­lary case

107

1505. Authorization to act in a for­eign coun­try

109

1506. Pub­lic pol­i­cy ex­cep­tion

109

1507. Additional as­sis­tance

109

1508. Interpretation

109

1509. Right of di­rect ac­cess

110

1510. Lim­ited ju­ris­dic­tion

111

1511. Commencement of Case Under Sec­tion 301 or 303

111

1512. Participation of a for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tive in a case un­der this ti­tle

111

1513. Access of for­eign cred­itors to a case un­der this ti­tle

111

1514. Notification of for­eign cred­itors con­cern­ing a case un­der ti­tle 11

112

1515. Application for rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign pro­ceed­ing

112

1516. Presumptions con­cern­ing rec­og­ni­tion

112

1517. Order grant­ing rec­og­ni­tion

113

1518. Sub­se­quent in­for­ma­tion

113

1519. Re­lief may be grant­ed up­on pe­ti­tion for rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign pro­ceed­ing

114

1520. Effects of rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign main pro­ceed­ing

114

1521. Re­lief that may be grant­ed up­on rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign pro­ceed­ing

115

1522. Pro­tec­tion of cred­itors and oth­er in­ter­ested per­sons

116

1523. Ac­tions to avoid acts detrimental to cred­itors

116

1524. Intervention by a for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tive

116

1525. Co­op­er­a­tion and di­rect com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween the court and for­eign courts or for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tives

117

1526  Co­op­er­a­tion and di­rect com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween the trust­ee and for­eign courts or for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tives

117

1527. Forms of co­op­er­a­tion

117

1528. Commencement of a case un­der ti­tle 11 af­ter rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign main pro­ceed­ing

117

1529. Coordination of a case un­der ti­tle 11 and a for­eign pro­ceed­ing

117

1530. Coordination of more than one for­eign pro­ceed­ing

118

1531. Presumption of in­sol­ven­cy based on rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign main pro­ceed­ing

118

1532. Rule of pay­ment in con­cur­rent pro­ceed­ing

118

802. Other amend­ments to ti­tles 11 and 28, Unit­ed States Code

118

901. Treatment of cer­tain agree­ments by con­ser­va­tors or re­ceivers of in­sured de­pos­itory in­sti­tu­tions

119

902. Au­thor­ity of the FDIC and NCUAB with re­spect to failed and fail­ing in­sti­tu­tions

123

903. Amend­ments re­lat­ing to trans­fers of qual­i­fied fi­nan­cial con­tracts

123

904. Amend­ments re­lat­ing to dis­re­af­firm­ance or repudiation of qual­i­fied fi­nan­cial con­tracts

125

905. Clarifying amend­ment re­lat­ing to mas­ter agree­ments

125

906. Fed­er­al De­pos­it In­sur­ance Cor­po­ra­tion Im­prove­ment Act of 1991

125

907. Bank­rupt­cy law amend­ments

127

908. Recordkeeping re­quire­ments

134

909. Ex­emp­tions from con­tem­po­ra­ne­ous ex­e­cu­tion re­quire­ment

134

910. Damage mea­sure

134

911. SIPC stay

135

1001. Permanent reenactment of chap­ter 12

136

1002. Debt lim­it in­crease

136

1003.Certain claims owed to gov­ern­men­tal units

136

1004. Def­i­ni­tion of fam­i­ly farm­er

137

1005. Elimination of re­quire­ment that fam­i­ly farm­er and spouse re­ceive over 50 per­cent of in­come from farm­ing op­er­a­tion in year pri­or to bank­rupt­cy

137

1006. Pro­hi­bi­tion of retroac­tive as­sess­ment of dis­pos­able in­come

137

1007. Fam­i­ly fishermen

137

1101. Definitions

138

1102. Disposal of pa­tient rec­ords

138

1103. Ad­min­is­tra­tive ex­pense claim for costs of clos­ing a health care busi­ness and oth­er ad­min­is­tra­tive ex­penses

139

1104. Ap­point­ment of om­buds­man to act as pa­tient advocate

139

1105. Debt­or in pos­ses­sion; du­ty of trust­ee to trans­fer pa­tients

140

1106. Exclusion from pro­gram par­tic­i­pa­tion not sub­ject to au­to­mat­ic stay

140

1201. Definitions

140

1202. Ad­just­ment of dol­lar amounts

141

1203. Ex­ten­sion of time

142

1204. Technical amend­ments

142

1205. Penalty for per­sons who neg­li­gent­ly or fraud­u­lent­ly pre­pare bank­rupt­cy pe­ti­tions

142

1206. Lim­itation on com­pen­sa­tion of pro­fes­sion­al per­sons

142

1207. Ef­fect of con­ver­sion

142

1208. Al­low­ance of ad­min­is­tra­tive ex­penses

142

1209. Ex­ceptions to dis­charge

142

1210. Ef­fect of dis­charge

143

1211. Pro­tec­tion against discriminatory treat­ment

143

1212. Prop­er­ty of the es­tate

143

1213. Pref­er­ences

143

1214. Post­pe­ti­tion trans­ac­tions

144

1215. Dis­po­si­tion of Prop­er­ty of the Estate

144

1216. Gen­er­al pro­vi­sions

144

1217. Abandonment of rail­road line

144

1218. Contents of plan

145

1219. Bank­rupt­cy cases and pro­ceed­ings

145

1220. Know­ing dis­re­gard of bank­rupt­cy law or rule

145

1221. Transfers made by non­prof­it char­i­ta­ble cor­po­ra­tions

145

1222. Pro­tec­tion of val­id pur­chase mon­ey se­cu­ri­ty in­ter­ests

145

1223. Bank­rupt­cy Judgeship

145

1224. Compensating trust­ees

146

1225. Amend­ment to sec­tion 362 of ti­tle 11, Unit­ed States Code

146

1226. Ju­di­cial ed­u­ca­tion

146

1227. Reclamation

146

1228. Pro­vid­ing re­quest­ed tax doc­u­ments to the court

146

1229. Encouraging cred­itworthiness

147

1230. Prop­er­ty no lon­ger sub­ject to re­demp­tion

147

1231. Trust­ees.

147

1232. Bank­rupt­cy forms

148

1233. Direct ap­peals of bank­rupt­cy mat­ters to courts of ap­peals

148

1234. Invol­un­tary cases

149

1235. Fed­er­al elec­tion law fines and pen­al­ties as non­dis­charge­able debt

149

1301. Enhanced dis­clo­sures un­der an open end cred­it plan

149

1302. Enhanced dis­clo­sure for cred­it ex­ten­sions se­cured by a dwell­ing

150

1303. Dis­clo­sures re­lated to "introductory rates"

150

1304. In­ter­net-based cred­it card so­lic­i­ta­tions

152

1305. Dis­clo­sures re­lated to late pay­ment deadlines and pen­al­ties

152

1306. Pro­hi­bi­tion on cer­tain ac­tions for fail­ure to in­cur finance charges

152

1307. Dual use debit card

153

1308. Study of bank­rupt­cy im­pact of cred­it ex­tend­ed to de­pen­dent stu­dents

153

1309. Clarification of clear and con­spic­u­ous

153

1401. Em­ploy­ee wage and ben­e­fit pri­orities

154

1402. Fraudulent trans­fers and ob­li­ga­tions

154

1403. Payment of in­sur­ance ben­e­fits to re­tired em­ploy­ees

154

1404. Debts non­dis­charge­able if in­curred in vi­o­la­tion of se­cu­ri­ties fraud laws

154

1405. Ap­point­ment of trust­ee in cases of suspected fraud

155

1406. Ef­fec­tive date; ap­pli­ca­tion of amend­ments

155

1501. Ef­fec­tive date; ap­pli­ca­tion of amend­ments

155

1502. Technical cor­rections

155

Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported

155

CHAPTER 1GENERAL PROVISIONS

156

§ 101 •.Definitions

156

§ 101(1) •.Accountant

156

§ 101(2) •.Affiliate

156

§ 101(3) •.Assisted per­son

156

§ 101(4) •.At­tor­ney

156

§ 101(4A) •.Bank­rupt­cy Assistance

156

§ 101(5) •.Claim

156

§ 101(6) •.Com­mod­i­ty Broker

156

§ 101(7) •.Community Claim

157

§ 101(7A) •.Com­mer­cial Fishing Operation

157

§ 101(7B) •.Com­mer­cial Fishing Vessel

157

§ 101(8) •.Con­sum­er Debt

157

§ 101(9) •.Cor­po­ra­tion

157

§ 101(10) •.Cred­i­tor

157

§ 101(10A) •.Current Monthly In­come

157

§ 101(11) •.Custodian

158

§ 101(12) •.Debt

158

§ 101(12A) •.Debt for Child Sup­port (Old)

158

§ 101(12A) •.Debt Re­lief Agency (New)

158

§ 101(13) •.Debt­or

158

§ 101(13A) •.Debt­or's Principal Residence

158

§ 101(14) •.Disin­ter­ested Per­son (Old)

158

§ 101(14) •.Disin­ter­ested Per­son (New)

159

§ 101(14A) •.Domestic Sup­port Obligation

159

§ 101(15) •.Entity

159

§ 101(16) •.Eq­ui­ty Se­cu­ri­ty

159

§ 101(17) •.Eq­ui­ty Se­cu­ri­ty Holder

160

§ 101(18) •.Fam­i­ly Farm­er

160

§ 101(19) •.Fam­i­ly Farm­er with Regular An­nu­al In­come

161

§ 101(19A) •.Fam­i­ly Fisherman

161

§ 101(19B) •.Fam­i­ly Fisherman with Regular An­nu­al In­come

161

§ 101(20) •.Farm­er

161

§ 101(21) •.Farming Operation

161

§ 101(21A) •.Farmout Agree­ment

161

§ 101(21B) •.Fed­er­al Depository Institutions Regulatory Agency

162

§ 101(22) •.Fi­nan­cial Institution (Old)

162

§ 101(23) •.For­eign Proceeding (Old)

162

§ 101(24) •.For­eign Rep­res­en­ta­tive (Old)

162

§ 101(22) •.Fi­nan­cial Institution (New)

162

§ 101(22A) •.Fi­nan­cial Participant

162

§ 101(23) •.For­eign Proceeding (New)

162

§ 101(24) •.For­eign Rep­res­en­ta­tive (New)

163

§ 101(25) •.Forward Contract

163

§ 101(26) •.Forward Contract Mer­chant (Old)

164

§ 101(26) •.Forward Contract Mer­chant (New)

164

§ 101(27) •.Gov­ern­men­tal Unit

164

§ 101(27A) •.Health Care Busi­ness

164

§ 101(27B) •.Incidental Prop­er­ty

165

§ 101(28) •.In­den­ture

165

§ 101(29) •.In­den­ture Trust­ee

165

§ 101(30) •.Individual with Regular In­come

165

§ 101(31) •.Insider

165

§ 101(32) •.Insolvent

165

§ 101(33) •.Institution-af­fil­i­ated Party

165

§ 101(34) •.Insured Cred­it Union

165

§ 101(35) •.Insured Depository Institution

165

§ 101(35A) Intellectual Prop­er­ty

165

§ 101(36) Ju­di­cial Lien

166

§ 101(37) Lien

166

§ 101(38) Margin Payment

166

§ 101(38A) Master Netting Agree­ment

166

§ 101(38B) Master Netting Agree­ment Participant

166

§ 101(39) Mask Work

166

§ 101(39A) Median Fam­i­ly In­come

166

§ 101(40) •  Municipality

166

§ 101(40A) Patient

166

§ 101(40B) Patient Rec­ords

166

§ 101(41) Per­son

167

§ 101(41A) Per­son­al­ly Identifiable Infor­ma­tion

167

§ 101(42) Pe­ti­tion

167

§ 101(42A) Pro­duc­tion Payment

167

§ 101(43) •  Purchaser

167

§ 101(44) Railroad

167

§ 101(45) Relative

167

§ 101(46) Repo Participant

168

§ 101(47) Repur­chase Agree­ment (Old)

168

§ 101(47) Repur­chase Agree­ment (New)

168

§ 101(48) Se­cu­ri­ties Clearing Agency

169

§ 101(48A) Se­cu­ri­ties Self Regulatory Or­gan­i­za­tion

169

§ 101(49) Se­cu­ri­ty

169

§ 101(50) Se­cu­ri­ty Agree­ment

169

§ 101(51) Se­cu­ri­ty Interest

169

§ 101(51A) Set­tle­ment Payment

169

§ 101(51B) Single As­set Real Estate

169

§ 101(51C) Small Busi­ness (Old)

170

§ 101(51C) Small Busi­ness Case (New)

170

§ 101(51D) Small Busi­ness Debt­or

170

§ 101(52) State

170

§ 101(53) Statutory Lien

170

§ 101(53A) Stockbro­ker

170

§ 101(53B) Swap Agree­ment (Old)

170

§ 101(53B) Swap Agree­ment (New)

171

§ 101(53C) Swap Participant

172

§ 101(56A) Term Overriding Royalty

172

§ 101(53D) Timeshare Plan

172

§ 101(54) Transfer (Old)

172

§ 101(54) Transfer (New)

173

§ 101(54A) Unin­sured State Mem­ber Bank

173

§ 101(55) Unit­ed States

173

§ 103. Ap­pli­ca­bil­i­ty of chap­ters

173

§ 104. Ad­just­ment of dol­lar amounts

173

§ 105. Power of court

174

§ 107. Pub­lic ac­cess to pa­pers

174

§ 108. Ex­ten­sion of time

174

§ 109. Who may be a debt­or

175

§ 110. Penalty for per­sons who neg­li­gent­ly or fraud­u­lent­ly pre­pare bank­rupt­cy pe­ti­tions

176

§ 111. Non­prof­it bud­get and cred­it coun­sel­ing agen­cies; fi­nan­cial man­age­ment in­struc­tion­al courses

180

§ 112. Pro­hi­bi­tion on dis­clo­sure of name of mi­nor chil­dren

183

CHAPTER 3CASE ADMINISTRATION

184

§ 301. Voluntary cases

184

§ 303. Invol­un­tary cases

184

[§ 304. Cases an­cil­lary to for­eign pro­ceed­ings]

185

§ 305. Ab­sten­tion

186

§ 306. Lim­ited ap­pear­ance

186

§ 308. Debt­or re­port­ing re­quire­ments

186

§ 328. Lim­itation on com­pen­sa­tion of pro­fes­sion­al per­sons

187

§ 330. Compensation of of­fi­cers

187

§ 332. Con­sum­er pri­va­cy om­buds­man

188

§ 333. Ap­point­ment of pa­tient care om­buds­man

188

§ 341. Meetings of cred­itors and eq­ui­ty se­cu­ri­ty hold­ers

189

§ 342. No­tice

189

§ 346. Special pro­vi­sions re­lated to the treat­ment of State and lo­cal taxes (Old)

191

§ 346. Special pro­vi­sions re­lated to the treat­ment of State and lo­cal taxes (New)

194

§ 348. Ef­fect of con­ver­sion

196

§ 351. Disposal of pa­tient rec­ords

197

§ 362. Au­to­mat­ic stay

198

§ 363. Use, sale, or lease of prop­er­ty

209

§ 365. Ex­ec­u­to­ry con­tracts and un­ex­pired leases

210

§ 366. Util­i­ty ser­vice

213

CHAPTER 5CREDITORS, THE DEBTOR, AND THE ESTATE

214

§ 501. Filing of proofs of claims or in­ter­ests

215

§ 502. Al­low­ance of claims or in­ter­ests

215

§ 503. Al­low­ance of ad­min­is­tra­tive ex­penses

216

§ 504. Sharing of com­pen­sa­tion

219

§ 505. Deter­mi­na­tion of tax li­a­bil­i­ty

219

§ 506. Deter­mi­na­tion of se­cured sta­tus

220

§ 507. Pri­orities

220

§ 508. Ef­fect of dis­tri­bu­tion oth­er than un­der this ti­tle

223

§ 511. Rate of in­ter­est on tax claims

224

§ 521. Debt­or's du­ties

224

§ 522. Ex­emp­tions

228

§ 523. Ex­ceptions to dis­charge

233

§ 524. Ef­fect of dis­charge

237

§ 525. Pro­tec­tion against discriminatory treat­ment

244

§ 526. Restrictions on debt re­lief agen­cies

244

§ 527. Dis­clo­sures

246

§ 528. Requirements for debt re­lief agen­cies

248

§ 541. Prop­er­ty of the es­tate

248

§ 545. Statutory liens

251

§ 546. Lim­itations on avoid­ing pow­ers

251

§ 547. Pref­er­ences

253

§ 548. Fraudulent trans­fers and ob­li­ga­tions

254

§ 549. Post­pe­ti­tion trans­ac­tions

256

§ 552. Post­pe­ti­tion ef­fect of se­cu­ri­ty in­ter­est

256

§ 553. Setoff

257

§ 555. Con­trac­tu­al right to liq­ui­date, ter­mi­nate, or ac­cel­er­ate a se­cu­ri­ties con­tract

257

§ 556. Con­trac­tu­al right to liq­ui­date, ter­mi­nate, or ac­cel­er­ate a com­mod­i­ties con­tract or for­ward con­tract

258

§ 559. Con­trac­tu­al right to liq­ui­date, ter­mi­nate, or ac­cel­er­ate a re­pur­chase agree­ment

258

§ 560. Con­trac­tu­al right to liq­ui­date, ter­mi­nate, or ac­cel­er­ate a swap agree­ment

260

§ 561. Con­trac­tu­al right to ter­mi­nate, liq­ui­date, ac­cel­er­ate, or off­set un­der a mas­ter net­ting agree­ment and across con­tracts; pro­ceed­ings un­der chap­ter 15

260

§ 562. Timing of dam­age mea­sure­ment in con­nec­tion with swap agree­ments, se­cu­ri­ties con­tracts, for­ward con­tracts, com­mod­i­ty con­tracts, re­pur­chase agree­ments, and mas­ter net­ting agree­ments

261

CHAPTER 7LIQUIDATION

262

§ 704. Duties of trust­ee

262

§ 706. Con­ver­sion

264

§ 707. Dismissal of a case or con­ver­sion to a case un­der chap­ter 11 or 13

264

§ 722. Redemption

270

§ 724. Treatment of cer­tain liens

270

§ 726. Distribution of prop­er­ty of the es­tate

271

§ 727. Discharge

271

[§ 728. Special tax pro­vi­sions]

272

§ 741. Definitions for this sub­chap­ter

273

§ 752. Customer prop­er­ty

274

§ 753. Stockbro­ker liq­ui­da­tion and for­ward con­tract mer­chants, com­mod­i­ty bro­kers, stock­bro­kers, fi­nan­cial in­sti­tu­tions, fi­nan­cial par­tic­i­pants, se­cu­ri­ties clear­ing agen­cies, swap par­tic­i­pants, repo par­tic­i­pants, and mas­ter net­ting agree­ment par­tic­i­pants

275

§ 761. Definitions for this sub­chap­ter

275

§ 766. Treatment of cus­tom­er prop­er­ty

276

§ 767. Com­mod­i­ty bro­ker liq­ui­da­tion and for­ward con­tract mer­chants, com­mod­i­ty bro­kers, stock­bro­kers, fi­nan­cial in­sti­tu­tions, fi­nan­cial par­tic­i­pants, se­cu­ri­ties clear­ing agen­cies, swap par­tic­i­pants, repo par­tic­i­pants, and mas­ter net­ting agree­ment par­tic­i­pants

276

CHAPTER 9 — ADJUSTMENT OF DEBTS OF A MUNICIPALITY

276

§ 901. Ap­pli­ca­bil­i­ty of oth­er sec­tions of this ti­tle

277

§ 921. Pe­ti­tion and pro­ceed­ings re­lat­ing to pe­ti­tion

277

§ 943. Con­fir­ma­tion

277

CHAPTER 11REORGANIZATION

277

§ 1102. Cred­i­tors' and eq­ui­ty se­cu­ri­ty hold­ers' com­mit­tees

278

§ 1104. Ap­point­ment of trust­ee or ex­am­iner

278

§ 1106. Duties of trust­ee and ex­am­iner

279

§ 1112. Con­ver­sion or dis­miss­al

280

§ 1114. Payment of in­sur­ance ben­e­fits to re­tired em­ploy­ees

282

§ 1115. Prop­er­ty of the es­tate

283

§ 1116. Duties of trust­ee or debt­or in pos­ses­sion in small busi­ness cases

283

§ 1121. Who may file a plan

284

§ 1123. Contents of plan

285

§ 1124. Impairment of claims or in­ter­ests

285

§ 1125. Post­pe­ti­tion dis­clo­sure and so­lic­i­ta­tion

286

§ 1127. Modification of plan

287

§ 1129. Con­fir­ma­tion of plan

287

§ 1141. Ef­fect of con­fir­ma­tion

289

§ 1146. Special tax pro­vi­sions

290

§ 1170. Abandonment of rail­road line

291

§ 1172. Contents of plan

291

CHAPTER 12ADJUSTMENT OF DEBTS OF A FAMILY FARMER OR FISHERMAN WITH REGULAR ANNUAL INCOME

291

§ 1202. Trust­ee

291

§ 1203. Rights and pow­ers of debt­or

292

§ 1206. Sales free of in­ter­ests

292

§ 1208. Con­ver­sion or dis­miss­al

292

§ 1222. Contents of plan

293

§ 1225. Con­fir­ma­tion of plan

294

§ 1226. Payments

295

§ 1228. Discharge

295

§ 1229. Modification of plan af­ter con­fir­ma­tion

295

§ 1231. Special tax pro­vi­sions

296

CHAPTER 13ADJUSTMENT OF DEBTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL WITH REGULAR INCOME

296

§ 1302. Trust­ee

296

§ 1307. Con­ver­sion or dis­miss­al

297

§ 1308. Filing of prepe­ti­tion tax re­turns

298

§ 1322. Contents of plan

299

§ 1324. Con­fir­ma­tion hear­ing

300

§ 1325. Con­fir­ma­tion of plan

300

§ 1326. Payments

303

§ 1328. Discharge

304

§ 1329. Modification of plan af­ter con­fir­ma­tion

306

CHAPTER 15ANCILLARY AND OTHER CROSS-BORDER CASES

306

§ 1501. Purpose and scope of ap­pli­ca­tion

307

§ 1502. Definitions

308

§ 1503. In­ter­na­tion­al ob­li­ga­tions of the Unit­ed States

309

§ 1504. Commencement of an­cil­lary case

309

§ 1505. Authorization to act in a for­eign coun­try

309

§ 1506. Pub­lic pol­i­cy ex­cep­tion

309

§ 1507. Additional as­sis­tance

309

§ 1508. Interpretation

309

§ 1509. Right of di­rect ac­cess

310

§ 1510. Lim­ited ju­ris­dic­tion

310

§ 1511. Commencement of case un­der sec­tion 301 or 303

310

§ 1512. Participation of a for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tive in a case un­der this ti­tle

310

§ 1513. Access of for­eign cred­itors to a case un­der this ti­tle

311

§ 1514. Notification to for­eign cred­itors con­cern­ing a case un­der this ti­tle

311

§ 1515. Application for rec­og­ni­tion

311

§ 1516. Presumptions con­cern­ing rec­og­ni­tion

312

§ 1517. Order grant­ing rec­og­ni­tion

312

§ 1518. Sub­se­quent in­for­ma­tion

313

§ 1519. Re­lief that may be grant­ed up­on fil­ing pe­ti­tion for rec­og­ni­tion

313

§ 1520. Effects of rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign main pro­ceed­ing

313

§ 1521. Re­lief that may be grant­ed up­on rec­og­ni­tion

314

§ 1522. Pro­tec­tion of cred­itors and oth­er in­ter­ested per­sons

315

§ 1523. Ac­tions to avoid acts detrimental to cred­itors

316

§ 1524. Intervention by a for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tive

316

§ 1525. Co­op­er­a­tion and di­rect com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween the court and for­eign courts or for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tives

316

§ 1526. Co­op­er­a­tion and di­rect com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween the trust­ee and for­eign courts or for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tives

316

§ 1527. Forms of co­op­er­a­tion

316

§ 1528. Commencement of a case un­der this ti­tle af­ter rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign main pro­ceed­ing

316

§ 1529. Coordination of a case un­der this ti­tle and a for­eign pro­ceed­ing

317

§ 1530. Coordination of more than 1 for­eign pro­ceed­ing

317

§ 1531. Presumption of in­sol­ven­cy based on rec­og­ni­tion of a for­eign main pro­ceed­ing

317

§ 1532. Rule of pay­ment in con­cur­rent pro­ceed­ings

317

TITLE 18CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

318

§ 156. Know­ing dis­re­gard of bank­rupt­cy law or rule

318

§ 157. Bank­rupt­cy fraud

318

§ 158. Designation of Unit­ed States at­tor­neys and agents of the Fed­er­al Bu­reau of In­ves­ti­ga­tion to ad­dress abu­sive re­af­fir­ma­tions of debt and ma­te­ri­al­ly fraud­u­lent state­ments in bank­rupt­cy sched­ules

319

TITLE 28JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

319

§ 152. Ap­point­ment of bank­rupt­cy judges

319

§ 157. Pro­ce­dures

320

§ 158. Appeals

320

§ 159. Bank­rupt­cy statistics

321

§ 586. Duties; su­per­vi­sion by At­tor­ney Gen­er­al

323

§ 589a. Unit­ed States Trust­ee Sys­tem Fund

325

§ 589b. Bank­rupt­cy data

326

§ 960. Tax li­a­bil­i­ty

327

§ 1334. Bank­rupt­cy cases and pro­ceed­ings

328

§ 1409. Venue of pro­ceed­ings aris­ing un­der ti­tle 11 or aris­ing in or re­lated to cases un­der ti­tle 11

329

§ 1410. Venue of cases an­cil­lary to for­eign pro­ceed­ings (Old)

329

§ 1410. Venue of cases an­cil­lary to for­eign pro­ceed­ings (New)

329

§ 1930. Bank­rupt­cy fees

329

§ 2075. Bank­rupt­cy rules

330

SECTION 406 OF THE JUDICIARY APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1990

331

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT

331

FEDERAL CREDIT UNION ACT

344

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1991

356

SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 1970

360

SECTION 302 OF THE BANKRUPTCY JUDGES, UNITED STATES TRUSTEES, AND FAMILY FARMER BANKRUPTCY ACT OF 1986

361

TRUTH IN LENDING ACT

361

Com­mit­tee Jurisdiction Letters

370

Markup Transcript

373

Sensenbrenner — opening remarks

373

Conyers — opening remarks

374

Conyers amend­ment — pay day loans made to ser­vicemem­bers (roll call)

376

Watt and Delahunt amend­ment — pro­hib­ition against usu­ry (roll call)

394

Watt amend­ment — postsecondary ed­u­ca­tion ex­penses (roll call)

402

Bush Plan Cuts College Aid for 500,000 (ar­ti­cle)

407

Nadler amend­ment — nondis­charge of debts re­lated to civ­il rights vi­o­la­tions (with­drawn)

418

Nadler amend­ment — ex­ten­sion of time to as­sume or re­ject non­res­i­den­tial real prop­er­ty (roll call)

422

Schiff amend­ment — no BC § 707(b)(2) dis­miss­al for iden­ti­ty theft vic­tims (roll call)

432

Delahunt amend­ment — avoid­ance of trans­fers made with­in 10 years of the bank­rupt­cy fil­ing to an as­set pro­tec­tion trust (BC § 548) (roll call)

445

Berman & Meehan — ex­emp­tion for med­i­cally dis­tressed debt­ors (BC § 522) (roll call)

453

Prepared State­ment of Zoe Lofgren

458

U.S. At­tor­ney let­ter to Rep. Grassley re: U.S. Trust­ee data on med­i­cal debts

460

Nadler amend­ment — nondis­charge of debts re­lated to civ­il rights vi­o­la­tions (BC § 523(a) (resub­mit­ted) (roll call)

467

Scott amend­ment — no 707(b)(2) dis­miss­al if sub­stan­tial por­tion of debt re­lated to ill­ness (voice vote only)

474

Scott amend­ment — no 707(b)(2) dis­miss­al if sub­stan­tial por­tion of debt re­lated to (1) busi­ness losses in­curred by a spouse or (2) unforeseen loss of em­ploy­ment (voice vote only)

477

Meehan amend­ment — no 707(b)(2) dis­miss­al for cer­tain dis­abled vet­er­ans (roll call)

481

Schiff amend­ment — GAO study re­lat­ing to Child Sup­port Payments (with­drawn)

488

Na­tion­al Child Sup­port Enforcement Letter: Child Cen­ter­ed Reforms in H.R. 333

492

Jackson Lee amend­ment — in­crease ex­pense al­low­ance for pri­vate schools (roll call)

493

Wash­ing­ton Post: A Bank­rupt­cy Re­form

496

Jackson Lee amend­ment — ex­clude funds re­ceived as a re­sult of a nat­u­ral disaster as ex­penses for means test­ing ex­penses (voice vote only)

500

Jackson Lee en bloc amend­ments — debts re­lated to (1) sex of­fenses against mi­nors; (2) tobacco claims (BC 523(a)(roll call)

502

Waters en bloc amend­ments — (1) no re­lief from stay to evict vic­tims of do­mes­tic vi­o­lence (BC § 362(b)(22); (2) ex­emp­tions for the el­der­ly (BC § 522(r); (3) is­su­ance of cred­it cards to un­derage con­sumers (15 U.S.C. § 1637(c))(voice vote only)

511

Watt en bloc amend­ments — (1) elim­i­nate re­quire­ment for debt­or's at­tor­ney to cer­ti­fy ac­cu­ra­cy of sched­ules; (2) cor­rect pro­vi­sions re­quir­ing at­tor­ney to iden­ti­fy themselves as debt re­lief agen­cies; (3) pre­vent sale of per­son­al con­sumer in­for­ma­tion on the eve of a cor­po­rate bank­rupt­cy (voice vote only)

517

Prepared State­ment of the Maxine Waters — 1

524

Prepared State­ment of the Maxine Waters — 2

525

Prepared State­ment of the Maxine Waters — 3

525

ABA let­ter re: at­tor­ney cer­ti­fi­ca­tion re­quire­ments

526

Mo­tion to re­port S. 256 fa­vorably

533


The Table of Contents has been expanded be­yond that con­tained in the orig­i­nal PDF version is­sued by the U.S. Gov­ern­ment Printing Of­fice.  In all oth­er re­spects, this version is iden­ti­cal to the of­fi­cial PDF version.  The pagination of the of­fi­cial PDF version has been re­tained.


2

PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

S. 256, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005," is a com­pre­hen­sive pack­age of re­form mea­sures per­tain­ing to both con­sumer and busi­ness bank­rupt­cy cases. The pur­pose of the bill is to im­prove bank­rupt­cy law and prac­tice by re­stor­ing per­son­al re­spon­si­bil­i­ty and in­teg­ri­ty in the bank­rupt­cy sys­tem and en­sure that the sys­tem is fair for both debt­ors and cred­i­tors.

With re­spect to the in­ter­ests of cred­i­tors, the pro­posed reforms re­spond to many of the fac­tors con­tri­but­ing to the in­crease in con­sumer bank­rupt­cy fil­ings, such as lack of per­son­al fi­nan­cial accountabil­i­ty, 1  the proliferation of serial fil­ings, and the ab­sence of ef­fec­tive over­sight to elim­i­nate abuse in the sys­tem. The heart of the bill's con­sumer bank­rupt­cy reforms con­sists of the im­ple­men­ta­tion of an in­come/ex­pense screening mech­a­nism ("needs-based bank­rupt­cy re­lief" or "means test­ing"), which is in­tend­ed to en­sure that debt­ors re­pay cred­i­tors the max­i­mum they can af­ford. S. 256 al­so es­tab­lishes new el­i­gi­bil­i­ty stan­dards for con­sumer bank­rupt­cy re­lief and in­cludes pro­vi­sions in­tend­ed to deter serial and abu­sive bank­rupt­cy fil­ings. It sub­stan­tial­ly augments the re­spon­si­bil­i­ties of those charged with ad­min­is­tering con­sumer bank­rupt­cy cases as well as those who coun­sel debt­ors with re­spect to ob­tain­ing such re­lief. In ad­di­tion, the bill caps the amount of home­stead eq­ui­ty a debt­or may shield from cred­i­tors, un­der cer­tain cir­cum­stances.

S. 256 al­so in­cludes various con­sumer pro­tec­tion reforms. The bill pe­nal­izes a cred­i­tor who un­rea­son­ably re­fuses to ne­go­ti­ate a pre-bank­rupt­cy debt re­pay­ment plan with a debt­or. It strengthens the dis­clo­sure re­quire­ments for re­af­fir­ma­tion agree­ments (agree­ments by which debt­ors ob­li­gate themselves to re­pay oth­er­wise dis­charge­able debts) so that debt­ors will be better in­formed about their rights and re­spon­si­bil­i­ties. The leg­is­la­tion re­quires cer­tain month­ly cred­it card billing state­ments to in­clude spe­ci­fied explanatory state­ments re­gard­ing the in­creased amount of in­ter­est and re­pay­ment time as­so­ci­ated with mak­ing min­i­mum pay­ments. The bill re­quires cer­tain home eq­ui­ty loan and cred­it card so­lic­i­ta­tions to in­clude enhanced con­sumer dis­clo­sures. It al­so pro­hib­its a cred­i­tor from ter­mi­nat­ing an open end con­sumer cred­it plan simply be­cause the con­sumer has not in­curred finance charges on the ac­count. S. 256 al­lows debt­ors to shel­ter from the claims of cred­i­tors cer­tain ed­u­ca­tion IRA plans and re­tire­ment pen­sion funds. It re­quires debt­ors to re­ceive cred­it coun­sel­ing be­fore they can be el­i­gi­ble for bank­rupt­cy re­lief so that they will make an in­formed choice about bank­rupt­cy, its al­ter­na­tives, and con­se­quences. The bill al­so re-

 

 

 

 


 

1.  As one ac­a­dem­ic ex­plained:

[S]hop­lift­ing is wrong; bank­rupt­cy is al­so a moral act. Bank­rupt­cy is a moral as well as an eco­nom­ic act. There is a conscious de­ci­sion not to keep one's pro­mises. It is a de­ci­sion not to reciprocate a ben­e­fit re­ceived, a good deed done on the pro­mise that you will reciprocate. Promise-keeping and reciprocity are the foun­da­tion of an econ­o­my and healthy civ­il society.

Bank­rupt­cy Re­form: Joint Hear­ing Be­fore the Subcomm. on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry and the Subcomm. on Ad­min­is­tra­tive Oversight and the Courts of the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,106th Cong. 98 (1999) (state­ment of Prof. Todd Zywicki)


 

3

 

quires debt­ors, af­ter they have filed for bank­rupt­cy, to par­tic­i­pate in fi­nan­cial man­age­ment in­struc­tion­al courses so they can hopeful­ly avoid fu­ture fi­nan­cial dis­tress.

With re­spect to busi­ness bank­rupt­cy, S. 256 in­cludes sev­er­al sig­nif­i­cant pro­vi­sions in­tend­ed to heighten ad­min­is­tra­tive scrutiny and ju­di­cial over­sight of small busi­ness bank­rupt­cy cases, which often are the least like­ly to re­or­ga­nize suc­cess­ful­ly. In ad­di­tion, it con­tains pro­vi­sions de­sign­ed to re­duce sys­tem­ic risk in the fi­nan­cial mar­ket­place, the en­act­ment of which Fed­er­al Re­serve Board Chair­man Alan Greenspan de­scribed as be­ing "extremely im­por­tant." 2  The bill in­cludes height­ened pro­tec­tions for fam­i­ly farm­ers facing fi­nan­cial dis­tress and al­lows fam­i­ly fishermen to qual­i­fy for a spe­cialized form of bank­rupt­cy re­lief cur­rently avail­able only to fam­i­ly farm­ers. The bill al­so in­cludes pro­vi­sions con­cern­ing transna­tion­al in­sol­ven­cies, bank­rupt health care pro­viders, the treat­ment of tax claims, and data col­lec­tion. In re­sponse to the exponential in­crease in bank­rupt­cy fil­ings, the bill au­tho­rizes the cre­a­tion of 28 ad­di­tion­al bank­rupt­cy judge­ships.

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR THE LEGISLATION

On Feb­ru­ary 1, 2005, Senator Charles Grassley (R-IA) (for himself and sev­en orig­i­nal cosponsors) introduced S. 256, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005." Thereaf­ter, F. James Sen­sen­brenner, Jr., Chair­man of the House Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry, (for himself and 60 orig­i­nal cosponsors) introduced leg­is­la­tion (H.R. 685) iden­ti­cal to S. 256 on Feb­ru­ary 9, 2005.

S. 256, as introduced, is sub­stan­tively iden­ti­cal to leg­is­la­tion that the House passed in the pri­or Con­gress on two sep­a­rate oc­ca­sions with over­whelming bi­par­tisan sup­port. 3  It is al­so sub­stan­tively sim­i­lar to a mod­i­fied version of a bank­rupt­cy re­form con­fer­ence re­port that the House passed in the 107th Con­gress by a vote of 244 to 116. 4

FACTORS SUPPORTING BANKRUPTCY REFORM

Repres­ent­ing the most com­pre­hen­sive set of re­forms in more than 25 years, S. 256's con­sumer bank­rupt­cy pro­vi­sions re­spond to sev­er­al fac­tors. First, the re­cent escalation of con­sumer bank­rupt­cy fil­ings does not ap­pear to be just a tem­po­rary event, but part of a gen­er­al­ly con­sis­tent up­ward trend. 5  In 1998, for ex­am­ple, bank­rupt­cy fil­ings ex­ceeded one mil­lion for the first time in our na­tion's


 

2. Letter from Alan Green­span, Chair­man, Fed­er­al Re­serve Board, to F. James Sen­sen­brenner, Jr., Chair­man, Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry (Sept. 3, 2002) (on file with the Sub­com­mit­tee on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law).

3. On March 19, 2003, the House passed H.R. 975, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pre­ven­tion Act of 2003," by a vote of 315 to 113. 149 CONG. REC. H2099-00 (dai­ly ed. Mar. 19, 2003). Thereaf­ter, the House, on Jan­u­ary 28, 2004, passed S. 1920, as amend­ed, the text of which was sub­sti­tuted with the text of H.R. 975, as passed by the House, by a vote of 265 to 99. 150 CONG. REC. H218-19 (dai­ly ed. Jan. 28, 2004).

4. H.R. Rep. No. 107-617 (2002). The mod­i­fi­ca­tions con­sisted of the de­le­tion of two pro­vi­sions, one deal­ing with un­law­ful pro­test ac­tiv­i­ties and the oth­er au­tho­riz­ing ad­di­tion­al bank­rupt­cy judge­ships. The text of the con­fer­ence re­port, as mod­i­fied, was in­tro­duced as H.R. 5545, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2003." H.R. 5545, 107th Cong. (2002). In turn, the text of H.R. 5545 was sub­sti­tuted as an amend­ment to H.R. 333. The House, there­af­ter, passed H.R. 333, as amend­ed . 148 CONG. REC. H8876-77 (dai­ly ed. Nov. 14, 2002).

5. Press Release, Ad­min­is­tra­tive Of­fice of the U.S. Courts, Rec­ord Break­ing Bank­rupt­cy Fil­ings Re­ported in Cal­en­dar Year 2002, at 1 (Feb. 14, 2003) (noting that "[b]ankruptcy fil­ings con­tin­ue to break historic rec­ords").


 

4

 

his­to­ry. Over the past decade, the num­ber of bank­rupt­cy fil­ings has near­ly doubled to more than 1.6 mil­lion cases filed in fis­cal year 2004.  6  As a re­sult, there is a grow­ing per­cep­tion that bank­rupt­cy re­lief may be too read­i­ly avail­able and is some­times used as a first re­sort, rath­er than a last re­sort.  7  De­spite the view of op­po­nents of bank­rupt­cy re­form that abuse in the sys­tem is not wide­spread and that most bank­rupt­cy fil­ings re­sult from causes be­yond debt­ors' con­trol, such as fam­i­ly ill­ness, job loss or dis­rup­tion, or di­vorce, 8  the Com­mit­tee con­clud­ed that reforms were nevertheless nec­es­sary.

Second, there are sig­nif­i­cant losses as­sert­ed to be as­so­ci­ated with bank­rupt­cy fil­ings. As one wit­ness ex­plained dur­ing the Sen­ate Ju­di­cia­ry Com­mit­tee's hear­ing on S. 256 ear­li­er this year:

Like all oth­er busi­ness ex­penses, when cred­i­tors are un­able to col­lect debts be­cause of bank­rupt­cy, some of those losses are inevitably passed on to re­spon­si­ble Amer­i­cans who live up to their fi­nan­cial ob­li­ga­tions. Every phone bill, elec­tric bill, mort­gage, fur­ni­ture pur­chase, med­i­cal bill, and car loan con­tains an implicit bank­rupt­cy "tax" that the rest of us pay to subsidize those who do not pay their bills. Exactly how much of these bank­rupt­cy losses is passed on from lenders to con­sumer bor­row­ers is un­clear, but eco­nom­ics tells us that at least some of it is. We all pay for bank­rupt­cy abuse in high­er down pay­ments, high­er in­ter­est rates, and high­er costs for goods and ser­vices. 9

According to some analyses, the in­crease in con­sumer bank­rupt­cy fil­ings has ad­verse fi­nan­cial con­se­quences for our nation's econ­o­my. For in­stance, it was es­ti­mat­ed that in 1997 alone more than $44 billion of debt was dis­charged by debt­ors who filed for bank­rupt­cy re­lief, 10 a figure when amortized on a yearly ba­sis amounts to a loss of at least $110 mil­lion ev­ery day. 11  These losses, ac­cord­ing to one es­ti­mate, trans­late into a $400 an­nu­al "tax" on ev­ery house­hold in our nation. 12  In 2003, the Nilson Report (a cred­it in­dus­try newsletter) announced that is­suers of pro­pri­e­tary and gen­er­al pur-

 

 

 

 


 

6. See Press Release, Ad­min­is­tra­tive Of­fice of the U.S. Courts, Bank­rupt­cy Filings Down in Fiscal Year 2004, at 1 (Dec. 3, 2004) (not­ing that "[d]e­spite the drop in fil­ings, bank­rupt­cies re­main at historic highs, well above the 1.5 mil­lion rec­ord first set in 2002"); Becky Yerak, Bankrupt Filings in E. Mich. Skyrocket; High Debt, Slow Economy Spur 22% Increase in 2002, Biggest Jump in the Unit­ed States, THE DETROIT NEWS, Feb. 24, 2003, at 1A (noting that in the Eastern Dis­trict of Michigan alone, bank­rupt­cy fil­ings for 2002 in­creased by 22 per­cent over the pri­or year).

7. See, e.g., Becky Yerak, Bankrupt Filings in E. Mich. Skyrocket; High Debt, Slow Economy Spur 22% Increase in 2002, Biggest Jump in the Unit­ed States, THE DETROIT NEWS, Feb. 24, 2003, at 1A (noting that "[t]he stigma of fil­ing for bank­rupt­cy con­tin­ues to abate while, at the same time, lenders im­pose few if any cred­it re­stric­tions").

8. See, e.g., Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005: Hear­ing on S. 256 Be­fore the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,109th Cong. (2005) (state­ment of Prof. Elizabeth Warren).

9. Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005: Hear­ing on S. 256 Be­fore the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,109th Cong. (2005) (pre­pared state­ment of Prof. Todd Zywicki).

10. Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1998 (Pt. I): Hear­ings on H.R. 3150 Be­fore the Subcomm. on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,105th Cong. 147 (1998) (state­ment of Mark Lauritano, Senior Vice Pres­i­dent, WEFA, Inc.).

11. Bank­rupt­cy Re­form: Joint Hear­ing Be­fore the Subcomm. on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry and the Subcomm. on Ad­min­is­tra­tive Oversight and the Courts of the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,106th Cong. 26 (1999) (state­ment of Dean Sheaffer on be­half of the Na­tion­al Retail Federation).

12. Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1998 (Pt. I): Hear­ings on H.R. 3150 Be­fore the Subcomm. on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,105th Cong. 147 (1998) (state­ment of Mark Lauritano, Senior Vice Pres­i­dent, WEFA, Inc.).


 

5

 

pose cred­it cards "lost $18.9 billion in 2002 from con­sumer bank­rupt­cy fil­ings," an in­crease of 15.1 per­cent over the pri­or year. 13  The Cred­it Union Na­tion­al As­so­ci­a­tion (CUNA) re­port­ed that cred­it unions, as of 2002, lost "nearly $3 bil­lion from bank­rupt­cies" since Con­gress be­gan its con­sid­er­ation of bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion in 1998. 14  CUNA es­ti­mates that over 40% of all cred­it union losses in 2004 will be bank­rupt­cy-re­lated, and those losses will to­tal ap­prox­i­mate­ly $900 mil­lion. 15

A third factor motivating com­pre­hen­sive re­form is that the pres­ent bank­rupt­cy sys­tem has loop­holes and in­cen­tives that al­low and—some­times—even en­cour­age opportunistic per­son­al fil­ings and abuse. A civ­il en­force­ment ini­tia­tive un­dertak­en in 2002 by the Unit­ed States Trust­ee Pro­gram (a com­po­nent of the Jus­tice De­part­ment charged with ad­min­is­tra­tive over­sight of bank­rupt­cy cases) has "con­sis­tently iden­ti­fied" such prob­lems as "debt­or mis­con­duct and abuse, miscon­duct by at­tor­neys and oth­er pro­fes­sion­als, prob­lems as­so­ci­ated with bank­rupt­cy pe­ti­tion pre­parers, and in­stances where a debt­or's dis­charge should be chal­lenged." 16  According to the Unit­ed States Trust­ee Pro­gram, "Abuse of the sys­tem is more widespread than many would have es­ti­mat­ed." 17  Such abuse ul­ti­mate­ly hurts con­sumers as well as cred­i­tors.

A fourth fac­tor re­lates to the fact that some bank­rupt­cy debt­ors are able to re­pay a sig­nif­i­cant por­tion of their debts, ac­cord­ing to sev­er­al stud­ies. 18  Cur­rent law, how­ever, has no clear man­date re­quir­ing these debt­ors to re­pay their debts. Ac­cord­ing­ly, "[w]hile there is a uni­ver­sal agree­ment among the courts that an in­di­vid­u­al debt­or's abil­i­ty to re­pay his or her debts from fu­ture earn­ings is, at the very least, a factor in de­ter­min­ing wheth­er sub­stan­tial abuse would oc­cur in a chap­ter 7 case, there are dif­fer­ences among the courts as to the ex­tent to which they rely on a debt­or's abil­i­ty to re­pay." 19

 

 

 

 


 

13. Bank­rupt­cy Losses on Cards, THE NILSON REPORT, Jan. 2003, at 1.

14.  John K. McKechnie, III, Letter to Editor, Cred­it Union J. 6 (June 24, 2002); see William R. Mapother, Counseling Could Overturn Losses, CREDIT UNION MAG. 34 (Dec. 2002) (quoting CUNA Pres­i­dent Dan Mica).

15. Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005: Hear­ing on S. 256 Be­fore the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,109th Cong. (2005) (pre­pared state­ment of Kenneth Beine).

16. Antonia G. Darling & Mark A. Redmiles, Protecting the Integrity of the Sys­tem: the Civ­il Enforcement Initiative, AM. BANKR. INSTITUTE J. 12 (Sept. 2002).

17. J. Christopher Marshall, Civ­il Enforcement: An Early Report, JOURNAL OF THE NAT'L ASS'N OF BANKR. TRUSTEES (NABTALK) 39 (Fall 2002).

18. See, e.g., Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1999 (Pt. II): Hear­ing on H.R. 833 Be­fore the Subcomm. on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,106th Cong. 298 (1999) (state­ment of Thomas S. Neubig, Ernst & Young LLP—Policy Eco­nom­ics and Quantitative Analysis Group, concluding that "large num­bers of 1997 U.S. chap­ter 7 filers have the abil­i­ty to re­pay large por­tions of their debts"); id. at 228-29 (state­ment of Michael E. Staten, Cred­it Research Center, concluding that "about 25 per­cent of chap­ter 7 debt­ors could have repaid at least 30 per­cent of their non-hous­ing debts over a 5-year re­pay­ment plan, af­ter ac­count­ing for month­ly ex­penses and hous­ing pay­ments" and that "[a]bout 5 per­cent of chap­ter 7 filers ap­peared ca­pa­ble of re­pay­ing all of their non-hous­ing debt over a 5-year plan," al­though these "calculations as­sumed in­come would re­main unchanged rel­a­tive to ex­penses over the 5 years"); Marianne B. Culhane & Michaela M. White, Tak­ing the New Con­sum­er Bank­rupt­cy Mod­el for a Test Drive: Means-Test­ing Real Chap­ter 7 Debt­ors, 7 AM. BANKR. L. J. 27, 31 (1999) (con­clud­ing that 3.6% of sampled debt­ors "emerged as ap­par­ent can-pays").

19. Robert C. Furr & Marc P. Barmat, 11 U.S.C. Sec­tion 707(b)—The U.S. Trust­ee's Weapon Against Abuse, NAT'L ASS'N BANKR. TRUSTEES (NABTALK) 11, 14 (Winter 2002-03).


 

6

 

PRIOR CONGRESSIONAL CONSIDERATION OF BANKRUPTCY REFORM

Proposed reforms to bank­rupt­cy law and prac­tice have been un­der con­sid­er­ation by Con­gress for nearly eight years 20  and have gen­er­al­ly enjoyed broad sup­port from the busi­ness com­mu­ni­ty, banking and fi­nan­cial ser­vices industries as well as oth­er groups such as fam­i­ly farm­ers and child sup­port en­force­ment agen­cies. In Con­gress, sup­port for bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion has like­wise been over­whelm­ing, bi­par­ti­san and bi­cam­er­al.

Since the 105th Con­gress, the House has passed bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion on eight sep­a­rate oc­ca­sions. In the 105th Con­gress, for ex­am­ple, the House passed both H.R. 3150, the "Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1998," and the con­fer­ence re­port on that bill by veto-proof margins. 21  In the 106th Con­gress, the House passed H.R. 833, the suc­ces­sor to H.R. 3150, by a veto-proof mar­gin of 313 to 108 22 and agreed to the con­fer­ence re­port 23  by voice vote. 24 Al­though the Sen­ate sub­se­quent­ly passed this leg­is­la­tion by a vote of 70 to 28, 25  Pres­i­dent Clin­ton pocket-vetoed it. In the 107th Con­gress, the House again reg­is­tered its over­whelm­ing sup­port for bank­rupt­cy re­form on two more oc­ca­sions. On March 1, 2001, the House passed H.R. 333, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act," by a vote of 306 to 108. 26  The House there­af­ter passed a mod­i­fied version of the con­fer­ence re­port on H.R. 333, as pre­vi­ous­ly noted.  27  In the last Con­gress, the House passed H.R. 975, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2003," by a vote of 315 to 113 and S. 1920, which con­sisted of the text of H.R. 975, as passed by the House, by a vote of 265 to 99. 28

Likewise, the Sen­ate has on nu­mer­ous oc­ca­sions ex­pressed strong bi­par­ti­san sup­port for bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion. In the 105th Con­gress, the Sen­ate passed bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion by a vote of 97 to 1. 29  In the 106th Con­gress, the Sen­ate passed sim­i­lar leg­is­la­tion by a vote of 83 to 14 30 and a sub­se­quent con­fer­ence re­port by a vote of 70 to 28. 31  In the 107th Con­gress, the Sen­ate passed a bank­rupt­cy re­form bill by a vote of 82 to 16. 32  Last month, the Sen­ate passed S. 256, as amend­ed, by a vote of 74 to 25. 33

The Com­mit­tee and the Subcom­mit­tee on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law (Subcom­mit­tee), be­gin­ning in the 105th Con­gress, have held a to­tal of 18 days of hear­ings on the op­er­a­tion of the

 

 

 

 


 

20. Comprehensive bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion (H.R. 2500, the "Responsible Bor­row­er Pro­tec­tion Bank­rupt­cy Act") was first formally introduced in the House on September 18, 1997. H.R. 2500, 105th Cong. (1997).    •   

 

21.44 CONG. REC. H4442 (dai­ly ed. June 10, 1998) (vote on fi­nal passage of H.R. 3150 was 306 to 118); 144 CONG. REC. H10239-40 (dai­ly ed. Oct. 9, 1998) (vote on fi­nal passage of the con­fer­ence re­port on H.R. 3150 was 300 to 125).    •   

 

22.145 CONG. REC. H2771 (dai­ly ed. May 5, 1999).    •   

 

23. H.R. REP. NO. 106-970 (2000).    •   

 

24.146 CONG. REC. H9840 (dai­ly ed. Oct. 12, 2000).    •   

 

25.146 CONG. REC. S11730 (dai­ly ed. Dec. 7, 2000).    •   

 

26.147 CONG. REC. H600-01 (dai­ly ed. Mar. 1, 2001).    •   

 

27. See supra note 3.    •   

 

28.149 CONG. REC. H2099-00 (dai­ly ed. Mar. 19, 2003);150 Cong. Rec. H218-19 (dai­ly ed. Jan. 28, 2004).    •   

 

29.144 CONG. REC. S10767 (dai­ly ed. Sept. 23, 1998).    •   

 

30.146 CONG. REC. S255 (dai­ly ed. Feb. 2, 2000).    •   

 

31.146 CONG. REC. S11730 (dai­ly ed. Dec. 7, 2000).    •   

 

32.147 CONG. REC. S2379 (dai­ly ed. Mar. 15, 2001).    •   

 

33.151 CONG. REC. S2474 (dai­ly ed. Mar. 10, 2005).    •   

 


 

7

 

bank­rupt­cy sys­tem and the need for re­form. 34  Eleven of these hear­ings were devoted sole­ly to con­sid­er­ation of S. 256's predecessors, H.R. 3150 (105th Con­gress), H.R. 833 (106th Con­gress), H.R. 333 (107th Con­gress), and H.R. 975 (108th Con­gress). Over the course of these hear­ings, nearly 130 wit­nes­ses, rep­re­sent­ing nearly ev­ery major constituency in the bank­rupt­cy com­mu­ni­ty, testified. With re­gard to H.R. 833 alone, tes­ti­mo­ny was re­ceived from 69 wit­nes­ses, rep­re­sent­ing 23 or­ga­ni­za­tions, with ad­di­tion­al ma­te­ri­al sub­mit­ted by oth­er groups.

The Sen­ate like­wise has held nu­mer­ous hear­ings on the sub­ject of bank­rupt­cy re­form and re­lated is­sues. Since the 105th Con­gress, the Sen­ate has held elev­en hear­ings, in­clud­ing a hear­ing held ear­li­er this year on S. 256. 35  In fact, the inaugural hear­ing on H.R.

   

34. The dates and sub­ject mat­ters of these hear­ings are as fol­lows:

April 16, 1997:

Hear­ing on the op­er­a­tion of the bank­rupt­cy sys­tem and sta­tus re­port from the Na­tion­al Bank­rupt­cy Review Com­mis­sion.

April 30, 1997:

Hear­ing on H.R. 764, the "Bank­rupt­cy Amend­ments of 1997," and H.R. 120, the "Bank­rupt­cy Law Technical Corrections Act of 1997."

October 9, 1997:

Hear­ing on H.R. 2592, the "Private Trust­ee Re­form Act of 1997" and re­view of post-con­fir­ma­tion fees in chap­ter 11 cases.

November 13, 1997:

Hear­ing on the Report of the Na­tion­al Bank­rupt­cy Review Com­mis­sion.

Feb­ru­ary 12, 1998:

Hear­ing on H.R. 2604, the "Religious Liberty and Charitable Donation Pro­tec­tion Act of 1997."

March 10-11, 18-19, 1998:

Hear­ings on H.R. 3150, the "Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1998," H.R. 3146, the "Con­sum­er Lenders and Borrowers Bank­rupt­cy Accountabil­i­ty Act of 1998," and H.R. 2500, the "Responsible Bor­row­er Pro­tec­tion Bank­rupt­cy Act."

March 11-12, 18-19, 1999:

Hear­ings on H.R. 833, the "Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1999."

November 2, 1999:

Joint over­sight hear­ing on ad­di­tion­al bank­rupt­cy judge­ship needs.

April 11, 2000:

Oversight hear­ing on the lim­its on reg­u­la­to­ry pow­ers un­der the Bank­rupt­cy Code.

Feb­ru­ary 7-8, 2001:

Hear­ings on H.R. 333, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2001."

March 4, 2003:

Hear­ing on H.R. 975, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2003" and the need for bank­rupt­cy re­form.

 

 

 

 

35. The Subcom­mit­tee on Ad­min­is­tra­tive Oversight and the Courts of the Sen­ate Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry con­duct­ed the fol­low­ing hear­ings:

April 11, 1997:

Hear­ing on the in­crease in per­son­al bank­rupt­cies and the crisis in con­sumer cred­it.

August 1, 1997:

Hear­ing to re­view the neg­a­tive im­pact of bank­rupt­cy on ed­u­ca­tion­al fund­ing.

August 8, 1997:

Hear­ing re­gard­ing bank­rupt­cy laws for fam­i­ly farm­ers.

September 22, 1997:

Hear­ing on the Bank­rupt­cy Code's ef­fect on re­li­gious freedom and a re­view of the need for ad­di­tion­al bank­rupt­cy judge­ships.

October 21, 1997:

Hear­ing to re­view the rec­om­men­da­tions of the Na­tion­al Bank­rupt­cy Review Com­mis­sion.

De­cem­ber 7, 1997:

Hear­ing re­gard­ing in­ter­na­tion­al bank­rupt­cy laws.

March 11, 1998:

Hear­ing on S. 1301, "The Con­sum­er Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act: Seeking Fair and Practical Solutions to the Con­sum­er Bank­rupt­cy Crisis."

May 19, 1998:

Hear­ing to re­view busi­ness bank­rupt­cy is­sues.

March 11, 1999:

Hear­ing on H.R. 833, the "Bank­rupt­cy Re­form Act of 1999," held joint­ly with the Subcom­mit­tee on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry.

November 2, 1999:

Oversight hear­ing on ad­di­tion­al bank­rupt­cy judge­ship needs held joint­ly with the Subcom­mit­tee on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry.

Feb­ru­ary 10, 2005:

Hear­ing on S. 256, the "Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005."


8

 

 

 

 

833 dur­ing the 106th Con­gress was held joint­ly by the Subcom­mit­tee to­geth­er with the Sen­ate Subcom­mit­tee on Ad­min­is­tra­tive Oversight and the Courts on March 11, 1999, 36  marking the first time in more than 60 years that a bicameral hear­ing was held on the sub­ject of bank­rupt­cy re­form. 37

It is al­so im­por­tant to note that bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion is the prod­uct of extensive bi­par­ti­san and bicameral ne­go­ti­a­tion and com­pro­mise. For ex­am­ple, con­ferees dur­ing the 106th Con­gress spent nearly sev­en months en­gaged in an informal con­fer­ence to reconcile dif­fer­ences be­tween the House and Sen­ate passed versions of bank­rupt­cy re­form leg­is­la­tion. In the 107th Con­gress, con­ferees formally met on three oc­ca­sions and 38 ul­ti­mate­ly agreed—af­ter an 11-month pe­ri­od of ne­go­ti­a­tions—to a bi­par­ti­san con­fer­ence re­port.

On Feb­ru­ary 10, 2005, the Sen­ate Com­mit­tee on the Ju­di­cia­ry held a hear­ing on S. 256 that pro­vided an op­por­tu­ni­ty to re­view the rea­sons why the cur­rent bank­rupt­cy sys­tem needs re­form and how this leg­is­la­tion would im­ple­ment those reforms. 39  Tes­ti­mo­ny was re­ceived from eight wit­nes­ses, in­clud­ing: Kenneth Beine on be­half of CUNA; Maria Vullo, a part­ner with the New York law firm of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; Malcom Bennett on be­half of the Na­tion­al Multi Hous­ing Council/Na­tion­al Apartment As­so­ci­a­tion; Philip Strauss on be­half of the Na­tion­al Child Sup­port Enforcement As­so­ci­a­tion; Dave McCall on be­half of the Unit­ed Steel Workers of Amer­i­ca, AFL-CIO; R. Michael Stewart Menzies, Sr. on be­half of the Inde­pen­dent Community Bankers of Amer­i­ca; Prof. Elizabeth Warren, Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law at Harvard Law School; and Prof. Todd J. Zywicki, Visiting Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center.

Among the mat­ters con­sid­ered at the hear­ing were: (1) the ad­e­qua­cy of the cur­rent bank­rupt­cy sys­tem with re­spect to the detection of fraud and abuse; (2) how abuse and fraud in the cur­rent bank­rupt­cy sys­tem im­pact on Amer­i­can busi­nesses and our nation's cit­i­zens gen­er­al­ly; (3) wheth­er the leg­is­la­tion ad­verse­ly impacts in­di­vid­u­als deserv­ing of bank­rupt­cy re­lief; (4) wheth­er the

 

 

 

 


 

36. Rep­res­en­ta­tives on be­half of the Com­mer­cial Law League of Amer­i­ca, CUNA, MBNA Amer­i­ca Bank, N.A., Na­tion­al Retail Federation, and the Na­tion­al Con­sum­er Law Center al­so testified. Some of the nation's lead­ing jurists and academics pre­sent­ed tes­ti­mo­ny as well. Bank­rupt­cy Re­form: Hear­ing Be­fore the Subcomm. on Com­mer­cial and Ad­min­is­tra­tive Law of the House Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry and the Subcomm. on Ad­min­is­tra­tive Oversight and the Courts of the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,106th Cong. (1999).

37. Senators tes­ti­fy­ing at the hear­ing in­cluded Charles Grassley (R-IA), Joseph Biden (D-DE) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT). House Members in­cluded Jim Moran (D-VA), Pete Sessions (R-TX) and Nick Smith (R-MI). Id.    •   

 

38. H.R. REP. NO. 107-617 (2002). Signatories on be­half of the House in­cluded: F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-WI), Henry Hyde (R-IL), George Gekas (R-PA), Lamar Smith (R-TX), Steve Chabot (R-OH), Bob Barr (R-GA), Rick Boucher (D-VA), Michael Oxley (R-OH), Spencer Bachus (R-AL), Billy Tauzin (R-LA), Joe Barton (R-TX), John Boehner (R-OH), and Michael Castle (R-DE). Signatories on be­half of the Sen­ate in­cluded: Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Joe Biden (D-DE), Charles Schumer (D-NY), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Mike DeWine (R-OH), Jeff Sessions (R-AL), and Mitch McConnell (R-KY).

39. Bank­rupt­cy Abuse Pre­ven­tion and Con­sum­er Pro­tec­tion Act of 2005: Hear­ing on S. 256 Be­fore the Subcomm. on Ad­min­is­tra­tive Oversight and the Courts of the Sen­ate Comm. on the Ju­di­cia­ry,109th Cong. (2005).    •   

 


 

9

 

pro­posed reforms would as­sist those who are charged with ad­min­is­tra­tive over­sight of bank­rupt­cy cases and law en­force­ment mat­ters; and (5) wheth­er, giv­en cur­rent eco­nom­ic cir­cum­stances, the need for com­pre­hen­sive bank­rupt­cy re­form still ex­ists.

On Feb­ru­ary 17, 2005, the Sen­ate Ju­di­cia­ry Com­mit­tee marked up S. 256 and or­dered the bill, as amend­ed, to be fa­vorably re­port­ed by a vote of 12 to 5. Over the course of the markup, five amend­ments were passed. These amend­ments con­sisted of the fol­low­ing:

1. an amend­ment by Senator Edward Ken­ne­dy (D-MA) clarifying that a debt­or's rea­son­ably nec­es­sary ex­penses for health in­sur­ance, dis­abil­i­ty in­sur­ance, and health sav­ings ac­counts for the debt­or and for the debt­or's spouse and de­pen­dents are al­lowed ex­penses un­der the bill's needs-based test;

2. an amend­ment by Senator Ken­ne­dy lim­iting re­ten­tion bo­nus­es, sev­er­ance pay, and oth­er pay­ments to in­siders of the debt­or, un­der cer­tain cir­cum­stances;

3. an amend­ment by Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI) in­creas­ing the mon­e­tary threshold with re­spect to the ven­ue of a pro­ceed­ing to re­cov­er a con­sumer debt;

4. an amend­ment by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) clarifying that a debt based on a Fed­er­al or state se­cu­ri­ties law vi­o­la­tion is non­dis­charge­able; and

5. an amend­ment by Senator Ken­ne­dy re­quir­ing the Unit­ed States trust­ee to ap­ply to the court for the ap­point­ment of a chap­ter 11 trust­ee if there are rea­son­able grounds to suspect fraud, un­der cer­tain cir­cum­stances.

On March 10, 2005, the Sen­ate passed S. 256, as amend­ed, by a vote of 74 to 25. Nearly 130 amend­ments were filed. Of the amend­ments that were of­fered, 24 failed, 24 were with­drawn, eight were passed ei­ther by vote or unan­i­mous con­sent. The amend­ments that were ac­cepted con­sisted of the fol­low­ing:

1. an amend­ment by Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) clarifying that the spe­cial cir­cum­stances ex­cep­tion to the bill's needs-based test in­cludes a debt­or with a se­ri­ous med­i­cal con­di­tion or a debt­or on ac­tive du­ty in the mil­i­tary to the ex­tent these fac­tors jus­ti­fy ad­just­ment to in­come or ex­penses as well as clarifying the safe harbor from the needs-based test with re­spect to vet­er­ans;

2. an amend­ment by Senator Leahy restricting pub­lic ac­cess to cer­tain per­son­al in­for­ma­tion re­gard­ing an in­di­vid­u­al con­tained in bank­rupt­cy case files to the ex­tent the court finds that dis­clo­sure of such in­for­ma­tion would cre­ate un­due risk of iden­ti­ty theft or oth­er un­law­ful in­ju­ry to such in­di­vid­u­al or the in­di­vid­u­al's prop­er­ty;

3. an amend­ment by Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA) in­creas­ing the fil­ing fees for chap­ter 7 and chap­ter 11 bank­rupt­cy cases, re­duc­ing the fil­ing fees for chap­ter 13, and ad­justing the allo­ca­tion of such fees among various gov­ern­men­tal en­ti­ties;


10

 

 

 

 

4. an amend­ment by Senator Feingold pro­vid­ing for the au­to­mat­ic pe­ri­odic ad­just­ment for inflation of cer­tain mon­e­tary amounts spe­ci­fied in the Bank­rupt­cy Code;

5. an amend­ment by Senator Feingold au­tho­riz­ing a court to: (a) seal all pub­lic rec­ords per­tain­ing to a fraud­u­lent in­vol­un­tary bank­rupt­cy pe­ti­tion, un­der cer­tain cir­cum­stances, (b) pro­hib­it any con­sumer re­port­ing agen­cy from is­su­ing any con­sumer re­port con­tain­ing any ref­er­ence to such pe­ti­tion; and (c) ex­punge all rec­ords per­tain­ing to such pe­ti­tion up­on the ex­pi­ra­tion of the stat­ute of lim­i­ta­tions for the crimes as­so­ci­ated with the fil­ing of a fraud­u­lent in­vol­un­tary bank­rupt­cy pe­ti­tion. It al­so amends the Fed­er­al crim­i­nal stat­ute to make it a crim­i­nal of­fense to file a fraud­u­lent in­vol­un­tary bank­rupt­cy pe­ti­tion; 40

6. an amend­ment by Senator Feingold creat­ing an ex­cep­tion to the bill's man­da­tory con­sumer cred­it coun­sel­ing and fi­nan­cial man­age­ment training re­quire­ments for a debt­or who is un­able to com­plete these re­quire­ments be­cause of inca­pac­i­ty, dis­abil­i­ty, or ac­tive du­ty in a mil­i­tary com­bat zone;

7. an amend­ment by Senator Richard Durbin (D-IL) creat­ing an ex­cep­tion from the bill's needs-based test for a dis­abled vet­er­an whose in­debt­ed­ness oc­curred pri­mar­i­ly dur­ing a pe­ri­od when the in­di­vid­u­al was on ac­tive du­ty or per­form­ing a home­land de­fense ac­tiv­i­ty; and

8. an amend­ment by Senator James Talent (R-MO) au­tho­riz­ing a bank­rupt­cy trust­ee to avoid any trans­fer of prop­er­ty by a debt­or to a self-set­tled trust made with­in ten years pre­ced­ing the fil­ing of the debt­or's bank­rupt­cy case if the debt­or is a ben­e­fi­cia­ry of such trust and the debt­or made such trans­fer with ac­tu­al in­tent to hin­der, de­lay, or de­fraud a cred­i­tor.

 

 

HIGHLIGHTS OF BANKRUPTCY REFORMS

Con­sum­er Cred­i­tor Bank­rupt­cy Protections.

Needs-Based Reforms. Chap­ter 7 is a form of bank­rupt­cy re­lief by which an in­di­vid­u­al debt­or re­ceives an im­me­di­ate un­con­di­tion­al dis­charge of per­son­al li­a­bil­i­ty for cer­tain debts in ex­change for relinquishing his or her non­ex­empt as­sets to a bank­rupt­cy trust­ee for liq­ui­da­tion and dis­tri­bu­tion to cred­i­tors. 41  This "un­con­di­tion­al dis­charge" in chap­ter 7 contrasts with the "con­di­tion­al dis­charge" pro­vi­sions of chap­ter 13, un­der which a debt­or com­mits to re­pay some por­tion of his or her fi­nan­cial ob­li­ga­tions in ex­change for re­tain­ing non­ex­empt as­sets and re­ceiv­ing a broader dis­charge of debt than is avail­able un­der chap­ter 7. Al­low­ing con­sumer debt­ors in fi­nan­cial dis­tress to choose vol­un­tar­i­ly an "un­con­di­tion­al dis­charge" has

 

 


 

40. This amend­ment is sim­i­lar to leg­is­la­tion con­sid­ered by the House in the 108th Con­gress. H.R. 1529, 108th Cong. (2003). The bill was or­dered fa­vorably re­port­ed with­out amend­ment by the House Ju­di­cia­ry Com­mit­tee, H.R. REP. NO. 108-110 (2003), and passed by voice vote by the House. 149 CONG. REC. H5104 (dai­ly ed. June 10, 2003). The prin­ci­pal dif­fer­ence be­tween this leg­is­la­tion and sec­tion 332 of the Act is that the bill would have per­mit­ted the court to ex­punge the case up­on dis­miss­al of the fraud­u­lent in­vol­un­tary pe­ti­tion.

41. Under the Bank­rupt­cy Code, only an in­di­vid­u­al may ob­tain a chap­ter 7 dis­charge. Thus, a cor­po­ra­tion is not el­i­gi­ble to re­ceive a dis­charge un­der chap­ter 7. 11 U.S.C. Sec. 727(a)(1).    •